To: NormsRevenge
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.
3 posted on
06/28/2010 11:13:53 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(We couldn't keep the commandments when there was only ONE!)
To: Graybeard58
Exactly.
This was an act of war, not terrorism.
16 posted on
06/28/2010 11:26:06 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(06/15/2010 Obama's Shame-Wow address...)
To: Graybeard58
Bingo Friend! If it is anything other than an act of WAR, I don’t know what it is.
17 posted on
06/28/2010 11:26:55 AM PDT by
JerseyDvl
(Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
To: Graybeard58
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.Yes, and the sinking of this warship is also an act of War. NKOR engaged in a clear "act of war" against South Korea. And Actions have Consequences.
34 posted on
06/28/2010 11:47:24 AM PDT by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: Graybeard58
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.according to the "O" boy it "was the act of one state's military against another."
No Biggie
43 posted on
06/28/2010 12:06:40 PM PDT by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: Graybeard58
57 posted on
06/28/2010 12:46:05 PM PDT by
keats5
(Not all of us are hypnotized.)
To: Graybeard58
I agree, the sinking of the sub was an act of war.
61 posted on
06/28/2010 1:07:39 PM PDT by
Free Vulcan
(No prisoners, no mercy. 2010 is here...)
To: Graybeard58
To: Graybeard58
96 posted on
07/04/2010 2:01:55 AM PDT by
Cindy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson