Cue the aerial pork......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
. . . and I own beach front property in Kansas
2 posted on
06/28/2010 9:25:25 AM PDT by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Kagan to tell senators at confirmation hearings Monday she'll be impartial on Supreme Court she will also try to sell them a bridge in Brooklyn and she has some nice swamp lands in Florida for sale.
3 posted on
06/28/2010 9:25:41 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Oh please. I guess she will always vote present?
5 posted on
06/28/2010 9:26:53 AM PDT by
GeronL
(Just say NO to conservativecave.com, it rots your teeth!)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
It's like "objective" news reporting. I'm not sure it exists. Basically, judges come in two flavors: Liberal Activists and Originalists. Pick one.
I grant that Anthony Kennedy may be somewhat impartial, since he swings between camps depending on his mood. He doesn't seem to be an ideologue. Kagan, on the other hand, is very much an ideologue and is trying to lie and present herself as something else.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Based on her writings and whatnot, the phrase "like he%%" comes to mind. That's why Bozo is suppressing her records. Otherwise, people would see that she wouldn't be impartial on issues.
Still, it's nice to know that the Lord has picked such an attractive person with which to inflict His judgement...
**sarcasm sequencer off**
7 posted on
06/28/2010 9:27:50 AM PDT by
Othniel
(Meddlng in human affairs for 1/20th of a millennium.......)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
"...in accordance with the law Constitution."
There, fixed it.
8 posted on
06/28/2010 9:27:54 AM PDT by
FrankR
(Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Let’s hope someone in the Senate has the temerity required to put on display all of Kagan’s “impartial” scrawlings and droolings starting with her college entrance essay.
9 posted on
06/28/2010 9:28:15 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Right, I’m sure she will.......
This is the best BO could do?
I hope the Repubs have spine enough to Bork her, and Bork her GOOD!
11 posted on
06/28/2010 9:28:46 AM PDT by
texson66
(Congress does not draw to its halls those who love liberty. It draws those who love power .)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
We all need to call our Senators in their DC offices and ask them to oppose this nomination.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
If obammma got to be where he is with the amount of experience he had, then this one is just as qualified to be a Supreme Court Judge. I wonder who will take Bird's place, could obammma’s wife be appointed.
14 posted on
06/28/2010 9:33:49 AM PDT by
shadeaud
("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin B)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
What a crock. She has open disdain and contempt for the constitution! She is totally unsuitable, America the country is dead let us hope that the idea that is America will live on. Somewhere at some future time people will come together to reestablish what it is to live as free individuals.
15 posted on
06/28/2010 9:35:19 AM PDT by
2001convSVT
("Hand out pocket Constitutions to everyone you can")
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Impartial?
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!
Thanks Elena...I needed a good laugh.
17 posted on
06/28/2010 9:38:07 AM PDT by
Allegra
(Topop!!!!!)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
“Kagan to tell senators at confirmation hearings Monday she’ll be impartial on Supreme Court”
Having been nominated by Obama refutes that claim.
18 posted on
06/28/2010 9:39:00 AM PDT by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
...and I’m going to try to stick to my diet over the weekend.
20 posted on
06/28/2010 9:41:32 AM PDT by
erkyl
(We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
The only thing this woman will be impartial about involves an all-you-can-eat buffet.
21 posted on
06/28/2010 9:43:23 AM PDT by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Perjury? Would that be the correct charge for such a blatant lie?
22 posted on
06/28/2010 9:47:17 AM PDT by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Impartial to what? Her views? The trouble with words like “impartial” and “objective” is they don’t reveal ones perspective.
If I were part of the grilling team, I would focus on her of the 1st and 2nd Amendment. Even moonbats seem to mostly understand the threat of eroding the 1st Amendment.
24 posted on
06/28/2010 9:47:56 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
"LOLOLOLOL!!! Stop! Yer killin' me!!!
25 posted on
06/28/2010 9:50:25 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson