Posted on 06/25/2010 4:39:42 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
In a surprising reversal that follows years of effort to design a one-of-a-kind commando rifle, the U.S. military's Special Operations Command has abruptly decided to abandon the new SOCOM Combat Assault rifle the "SCAR," as the rifle is commonly known in favor of previously-fielded carbines.
Details provided exclusively to Military.com reveal that SOCOM, the Tampa-based command that oversees the training and equipping of SEALs, Green Berets, Air Force Special Tactics Teams and Marine SOC groups, will stop purchasing the 5.56 mm Mk-16 Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle and might require all units who now have them to turn the new weapons back into the armory. The Mk-16 does not provide enough of a performance advantage over the M-4 to justify spending USSOCOM's limited
funds when competing priorities are taken into consideration," officials at USSOCOM said in an email response to questions from Military.com. "Currently, three of USSOCOM's four components receive the 5.56 mm M-4 from their parent service as a service common equipment item." (Naval Special Warfare Command is the only component that does not purchase its weapons with Navy funds.)
(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...
When I bought my M1A it had a special order Choate folding stock, made it horribly unbalanced, bought a GI fiberglass stock and stiffened the forend channel with some JB Steelweld and some cutdown fitted pair of carbon fiber hunting arrows, they are epoxied into the front channel.
Tension is balanced much better with the stiffer forend, and to finish the stock I used a heat gun and some black crinkle paint with the exception of the checkered area which was painted with a dark gray stone effect paint for grippag, The buttplate parts were coated and baked in an oven with epoxy matte black ceramic exhaust paint.
For shits and giggles I have a sizable stock of reloads using the Barnes Triple shocks, an all copper bullet that petals out like a high speed propeller through flesh, its a hunting round noted for its one shot kills. Though I reload for where I live in Alaska and for me the .308 is a bantamweight compared to my .338 and .375 at least with the Barnes I do get an edge, sure they are expensive.
That's a wicked bullet that one. Up the thread I talked about them. I built a couple hundred of them with those hard CCI primers in Lake City brass. I'm pushing them with Reloader 12. They shoot pretty darned well through my M1A.
I sure wouldn't want to be on the recieving end of one.
I’m a contractor for the Navy and they’ve had their funding cut dramatically. Most programs took a 30% cut and a lot of them that were in the early stages of development were cut all together.
Travis, is that red crap the lacquer from Wolf ammo?
Or were you letting your kids do some shooting after a PB&J lunch?
I’m actually a believe in not cleaning guns (aside from bore treatment of precision rifles). It’s like training with crappy ammo. The duds help you get accustomed to failures, and you need to know how far you can push the system when you need to.
The GI stocks were built long before fiberglass stock technology matured. Today, a top stock from Rimrock or McMillan with hand-laid fiberglass cloth and internal reinforcing is super stiff in the fore-end and through the action, and then just flexible enough in the butt to slow the recoil impulse. Injected or tupperware stocks cant offer any of those features. Likewise, kevlar or graphite end-to-end is a bad idea, just for recoil.
Anything other than high end can benefit from reinforcing the barrel channel. Over the years everything from v-8 push rods to graphite arrows have been used. Today, I would get a sheet of carbon fiber and line the barrel channel, using Marine Tex or Acraglass epoxy. Any rifle can benefit from a proper bedding job and the instructions for the M1 can easily be adapted to an M1A. (I believe a Mini-14 would also benefit.) In brief, this is a several step process that tensions the action and trigger housing assembly in the stock and relieves any pressure on the barrel, gas cylinder, or operating rod. That is one major difference between a rack grade and a National Match rifle.
Good shooting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.