Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Libs Hate Her Because She's Beautiful, Not Like That Michelle Obama
The Houston Press ^ | 6/23/10

Posted on 06/23/2010 8:50:59 AM PDT by llevrok

Texas Tech, that bastion of Americanism way out there in Lubbock, has done it again.

This time they're not protesting a statue that allegedly features Commies and lesbians, nor are they linking tattoos to social deviance.

This time, they're saying liberals hate Sarah Palin because she's beautiful, and libs prefer dogs like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton and Elena Kagan. Well, at least one Red Raider is.

A.W.R. Hawkins writes an online column for the conservative Human Events and proudly lists in his bio that he has a Ph.D. in military history from Tech. Which makes him an expert on dames, apparently.

Libs and Dems hate Sarah Palin because she's for smaller government, he writes in his latest column; they hate her because she didn't go to an Ivy League school and they hate her because "she chose to carry her Down Syndrome baby to term instead of aborting it. (That last one really drives them crazy.)"

But what really sets these abortion-loving atheists off? "[A]ll these reasons are trumped by the fact that they despise her beauty," he writes.

As a member of the media, we supposedly knew this already:

The double standard resides here: When Palin dresses in nice clothes reporters act like she's being ostentatious, but when Mrs. Obama does it reporters are taken aback by her glamour. Yet the dirty little secret is that Palin could don a $90.00 dress from Wal-Mart and steal the show from a diamond covered Mrs. Obama any day, and the media knows it. Got it. The analysis goes even deeper, hard as it may be to believe:

[T]he left criticizes that which they fear. We also have to keep in mind the fact that all the names they throw at Palin are really code words for "Dang, that woman looks good."

And who can blame them for noticing? After all, since the 1930s they've spent their time supporting women who looked like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton, Janet Reno, Tipper Gore, and Elena Kagan.

Suffice it to say there isn't a lot of pinup potential in that list. Texas Tech represent!!! No fatties allowed!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2010electionbias; catfight; dnctalkingpoints; downisup; getpalin; houston; houstonpress; lyingliar; plainbashing; pravdamedia; stalinisttactics; villagevoicemedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: SMARTY

Michelle hasn’t made a public appearance in days — actually more than a week. Rumor is that she had “work” during the California trip and will emerge with obvious “improvements”.


21 posted on 06/23/2010 8:59:36 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Can’t we stick to substance and not appearance? Her husband is destroying the nation...we should keep our eyes on the ball.


22 posted on 06/23/2010 9:00:00 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Going around with an 800 lb. chip on your shoulder doesn’t improve your looks!

Not to mention that 800 pound butt she has!

23 posted on 06/23/2010 9:00:14 AM PDT by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Sarah is a NATURAL beauty. They’re all green with envy!


24 posted on 06/23/2010 9:00:24 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok; SMARTY; AngelesCrestHighway; Ancient Drive; apocalypto; Graybeard58; a fool in paradise; ..

Misleading title.

Colon is used generally to denote a speaker.

This title implies that Sarah said this.

The article essentially attributes it to all of Texas Tech.

Not at all true on either account.

It’s one guy’s post. Mountain meet molehill.


25 posted on 06/23/2010 9:00:31 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows

26 posted on 06/23/2010 9:00:36 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: max americana

They hate her because she is successful. They have convinced themselves that she has been successful because of her looks. Lord knows that it couldn’t be for her ideas...


28 posted on 06/23/2010 9:01:09 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
I know otherwise rational women who hate her. Why? They don't come out and say it, but it's obvious.

Lots of women are jealous of beautiful women. Especially powerful ones like Palin.

29 posted on 06/23/2010 9:01:19 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

What a dog!


30 posted on 06/23/2010 9:01:24 AM PDT by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

Just serving it back to the Pravda Press which trots out such naked lies like this every day.

Counter their fraudulent claims. Did you see the “representative” photo they chose to champion MO with?

Looks shooped!


31 posted on 06/23/2010 9:02:06 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Where is Botox manufactured?
I assume they ship it to California by the railroad tank car.


32 posted on 06/23/2010 9:02:41 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Rumor is that she had “work” during the California trip and will emerge with obvious “improvements”.


33 posted on 06/23/2010 9:02:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Could it be what Sarah says and stands for, and the lefts knee-jerk reaction to anyone and anything decent, rather than her looks?
Michele and what she looks like is a non-issue in my opinion.

34 posted on 06/23/2010 9:05:33 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

They hate her because she poses a threat to the establishment’s selected One.

When Hillary opposed Barack (before joining his cabinet), even Bill Clinton commented on the Chicago thug tactics that the Obama team was using against Hillary Clinton.

The Left who’d held their tongues silent for 18 long years on the Clintons finally called her a “b****” for staying in the race. The media covered up the John Edwards affair (and Mark Halperin defends that decision while also defending his decision to report on the rumors of John McCain affair) to keep Hillary in a three way race for delegates.

When Hillary was out of the race and Sarah Palin was in it, they went from calling the female candidate the b**** word to using the c*** word.

It’s not about looks. It’s not about politics (Obamacare is Hillarycare). It is about the challenge to The One’s golden child status.


35 posted on 06/23/2010 9:05:39 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Source: Time Magazine (Time.com):

http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1889051_1865162,00.html
_____________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Source:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mitchelles-gifts-to-g20-spouses-porcelain/521488/

36 posted on 06/23/2010 9:05:42 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
37 posted on 06/23/2010 9:07:20 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Looks shooped!

It does look photoshopped, but I don't care how unattractive the president's wife is. Her husband is destroying the nation, and I think we should pass on acting like liberals and keep our eyes on what her husband is doing. That's my opinion...obviously, mileage will vary.

38 posted on 06/23/2010 9:08:48 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

every time I see that photo I feel bad for the dog (on the right)


39 posted on 06/23/2010 9:10:14 AM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Only *they* are allowed to be “Beautiful People”...Even if they look like HRC, Behar, R. O’Donnell, J. Garbagiholio,
Rachael SickSow, R. Barr, Kathy Griffin, Oliver Stone, Andy Dick, Al Gore, Helen Thomas, Sarah J. Parker, Maxine Waters, Barbara Boxer, B. Streisand, Alec Baldwin, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera...


40 posted on 06/23/2010 9:12:27 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson