Posted on 06/23/2010 8:50:59 AM PDT by llevrok
Texas Tech, that bastion of Americanism way out there in Lubbock, has done it again.
This time they're not protesting a statue that allegedly features Commies and lesbians, nor are they linking tattoos to social deviance.
This time, they're saying liberals hate Sarah Palin because she's beautiful, and libs prefer dogs like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton and Elena Kagan. Well, at least one Red Raider is.
A.W.R. Hawkins writes an online column for the conservative Human Events and proudly lists in his bio that he has a Ph.D. in military history from Tech. Which makes him an expert on dames, apparently.
Libs and Dems hate Sarah Palin because she's for smaller government, he writes in his latest column; they hate her because she didn't go to an Ivy League school and they hate her because "she chose to carry her Down Syndrome baby to term instead of aborting it. (That last one really drives them crazy.)"
But what really sets these abortion-loving atheists off? "[A]ll these reasons are trumped by the fact that they despise her beauty," he writes.
As a member of the media, we supposedly knew this already:
The double standard resides here: When Palin dresses in nice clothes reporters act like she's being ostentatious, but when Mrs. Obama does it reporters are taken aback by her glamour. Yet the dirty little secret is that Palin could don a $90.00 dress from Wal-Mart and steal the show from a diamond covered Mrs. Obama any day, and the media knows it. Got it. The analysis goes even deeper, hard as it may be to believe:
[T]he left criticizes that which they fear. We also have to keep in mind the fact that all the names they throw at Palin are really code words for "Dang, that woman looks good."
And who can blame them for noticing? After all, since the 1930s they've spent their time supporting women who looked like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton, Janet Reno, Tipper Gore, and Elena Kagan.
Suffice it to say there isn't a lot of pinup potential in that list. Texas Tech represent!!! No fatties allowed!
Michelle hasn’t made a public appearance in days — actually more than a week. Rumor is that she had “work” during the California trip and will emerge with obvious “improvements”.
Can’t we stick to substance and not appearance? Her husband is destroying the nation...we should keep our eyes on the ball.
Not to mention that 800 pound butt she has!
Sarah is a NATURAL beauty. They’re all green with envy!
Misleading title.
Colon is used generally to denote a speaker.
This title implies that Sarah said this.
The article essentially attributes it to all of Texas Tech.
Not at all true on either account.
It’s one guy’s post. Mountain meet molehill.
They hate her because she is successful. They have convinced themselves that she has been successful because of her looks. Lord knows that it couldn’t be for her ideas...
Lots of women are jealous of beautiful women. Especially powerful ones like Palin.
What a dog!
Just serving it back to the Pravda Press which trots out such naked lies like this every day.
Counter their fraudulent claims. Did you see the “representative” photo they chose to champion MO with?
Looks shooped!
Where is Botox manufactured?
I assume they ship it to California by the railroad tank car.
They hate her because she poses a threat to the establishment’s selected One.
When Hillary opposed Barack (before joining his cabinet), even Bill Clinton commented on the Chicago thug tactics that the Obama team was using against Hillary Clinton.
The Left who’d held their tongues silent for 18 long years on the Clintons finally called her a “b****” for staying in the race. The media covered up the John Edwards affair (and Mark Halperin defends that decision while also defending his decision to report on the rumors of John McCain affair) to keep Hillary in a three way race for delegates.
When Hillary was out of the race and Sarah Palin was in it, they went from calling the female candidate the b**** word to using the c*** word.
It’s not about looks. It’s not about politics (Obamacare is Hillarycare). It is about the challenge to The One’s golden child status.
Source: Time Magazine (Time.com):
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1889051_1865162,00.html
_____________________________________________
Source:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mitchelles-gifts-to-g20-spouses-porcelain/521488/
It does look photoshopped, but I don't care how unattractive the president's wife is. Her husband is destroying the nation, and I think we should pass on acting like liberals and keep our eyes on what her husband is doing. That's my opinion...obviously, mileage will vary.
every time I see that photo I feel bad for the dog (on the right)
Only *they* are allowed to be “Beautiful People”...Even if they look like HRC, Behar, R. O’Donnell, J. Garbagiholio,
Rachael SickSow, R. Barr, Kathy Griffin, Oliver Stone, Andy Dick, Al Gore, Helen Thomas, Sarah J. Parker, Maxine Waters, Barbara Boxer, B. Streisand, Alec Baldwin, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.