Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama & Holder: “YOU have NO standing to ask any Questions!”
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/24471#When:22:16:58Z ^

Posted on 06/21/2010 12:15:29 PM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: RoadTest
You are in this job to serve me.

Good luck with that.

21 posted on 06/21/2010 1:18:12 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

What Americans aren’t getting is that this information is being “protected” by all sides.

It’s not just Democrats.

If the powers that be really wanted it public, they could make it so.

And it serves the purpose of damaging American confidence, which is a top priority, if not the highest priority.


22 posted on 06/21/2010 1:25:53 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unique

‘Is “legal standing” defined somewhere in law?’

Right. That little phrase has been used repeatedly to swat away any legal challenges to bammy’s NBC qualifications.

You silly people (they seem to say), you can’t expect to have an accountable executive when he’s the white guilt/black messiah! He is what you so vociferously asked for at the end of the Bush era. So shut up, and suck it up private!


23 posted on 06/21/2010 1:26:28 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Ehh...Big Gov GOP and Big Gov Dems is the RinoCrat Oligarchy...the ruling party in DC since the ‘30’s...and the “Bamster, with his DeathCare Bill has delivered more toys for them since FDR. They ain’t, and he ain’t, goin’ nowhere

Most income tax-70% of it -is paid by 10% of the country. “Bammy is their boy. If you’re not part of that group...you haven’t “standing” for jack sh*&!!


24 posted on 06/21/2010 1:30:22 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boucheau

“What Americans aren’t getting is that this information is being “protected” by all sides.

It’s not just Democrats.

If the powers that be really wanted it public, they could make it so.”
++++++++++++++++

The Republigan leadership is still trying to play the game nicely with the RATS in the sandbox. The Tea Partiers are spoiling that little statist, spending us into oblvion, debt based money party.

SO SORRY. We want our country back!! (yeah, if that makes us extremists to you, go ahead and call us that - extreme patriots for our dear land).


25 posted on 06/21/2010 1:31:01 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

“Suppose, for example, the dad was an American citizen instead of Barack H. Obama Sr. That tosses his name, his heritage, his books, everything. It does not disqualify him from being President but it thoroughly trashes his veracity and biography.”

You mean at the least he’s a RAT liar...a RAT truthteller is an oxymoron. At the most, he’s ineligible to be the POTUS, and should be removed from office.


26 posted on 06/21/2010 1:41:01 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

>> The Obama administration is operating like a pure dictatorship ...

Or a defense team trying to hide something.


27 posted on 06/21/2010 1:46:28 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Basically, yes. But it isn’t illegal to be a lying President so long as the lying doesn’t go to basic requirements of the office. What I am saying is he may have more than the citizenship issue to prompt him to hide his true biography. There’s parentage, grades, associations, faith, you name it he might be trying to hide.


28 posted on 06/21/2010 1:47:13 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: unique; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan

As I understand it “standing” means that you have been injured and you have proof an illegality was committed against you. Proof does not equal mere suspicion.


29 posted on 06/21/2010 2:00:21 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
“What I am saying is he may have more than the citizenship issue to prompt him to hide his true biography. There’s parentage, grades, associations, faith, you name it he might be trying to hide.”

You make a good point. Basically it reinforces Obama as the worst joke a president ever hoisted upon us, or something more nefarious.

30 posted on 06/21/2010 2:38:17 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: unique
Is “legal standing” defined somewhere in law?

It is, but it's irrelevant in Lakin's case. Standing is the legal ability to sue in civil court. Lakin has been charged with the military equivalent of a felony. He will have his day in court, as the defendant and not the plaintiff. And he will have access to all the evidence necessary to show how he didn't miss movement and why his brigade commander's orders were illegal.

31 posted on 06/21/2010 2:41:53 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

See #29. Ltc Lakin can’t prove he’s been injured ‘cause he can’t prove Obama is ineligible. There’s great suspicion but no proof.


32 posted on 06/21/2010 3:23:19 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
You said, "I believe those two have let their licenses become inactive."

around campaign time it was mentioned that Michelle called in a favor to get a job because she LOST her license.

BUT I think like everything I've seen so far about Obambi, he never had a license.

Do you find it odd that none of his classmates at Columbia ever met him? ... shrug...

Obambi is Soros' puppet and he will take the fall ... you can see evidence of that now... in way over his head...

33 posted on 06/21/2010 3:26:22 PM PDT by xtinct (The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins
See #29. Ltc Lakin can’t prove he’s been injured ‘cause he can’t prove Obama is ineligible. There’s great suspicion but no proof.

Again, standing isn't the issue here. Lakin hasn't suffered an injury. Lakin is being court martialed, he isn't suing Obama. As you of all people should know, Lakin has been charged with the military equivalent of a crime and he's the defendant. This isn't a civil case here. Lakin could very well wind up spending time in Leavenworth.

34 posted on 06/21/2010 3:32:40 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
around campaign time it was mentioned that Michelle called in a favor to get a job because she LOST her license.

She didn't lose it. According to the state her license is "Voluntarily inactive".

BUT I think like everything I've seen so far about Obambi, he never had a license.

If Obama never had a license then how could it be revoked?

Do you find it odd that none of his classmates at Columbia ever met him? ... shrug...

That would come as a surprise to the people who are on record as remembering Obama while he was at Columbia.

35 posted on 06/21/2010 3:39:36 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

My point is that lakin can claim to have been I njured by obama but he can’t demonstrate it. His case is a result of an attempt on his part to force obama’s hand regarding natural born citizenship. (As you say missing movement is a serious charge. If his defense is “I believe the president is an alien” that doesn’t really change the fact of missing movement.)

If I claim you injured me in an auto accident and sue you for it, it’s nice if I can demonstrate a connection between you and my injuries.)


36 posted on 06/21/2010 4:00:22 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Who are those people? I recall reading that some recalled himliving in the area, they recalled his pakistani roomie etc, but I’ve read nothing about him attending classes etc, do you have a link?


37 posted on 06/21/2010 4:01:19 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Why is it the best US political writings seem to come from the Canada Free Press? Hmmm.


38 posted on 06/21/2010 4:02:35 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

“if in fact, he and Michelle ever passed the bar.”

There no way to actually confirm any facts with these bozos. They are immune to the reality the rest of the world must deal with daily. Enough!


39 posted on 06/21/2010 5:11:13 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unique
Same comment as before:

What is he Hiding and Why?

I hope some day we find out. . .

40 posted on 06/21/2010 5:24:43 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson