The solution is simple.
White people should not be allowed to vote.
That judge needs to be horse whipped. This is freaking unbelievable!
Again, the racial reason for doing this is absurd, but different voting schemes are not without precedent in the US. I seem to remember that Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania did something like this historically.
My friend lives there and this is true with a large illegal
population.
"Guinier's theories were first presented in law-school publications. They were also aired in part with her 1994 publication, The Tyranny of the Majority. In this work and others, Guinier suggests various ideas to strengthen minority groups' voting power, and rectify what is, according to her, an unfair voting system.... Some of the ideas she considers are:
Cumulative voting, a system in which each voter has "the same number of votes as there are seats or options to vote for, and they can then distribute their votes in any combination to reflect their preferences"--a system often used on corporate boards in 30 states, as well as by school boards and county commissions.
Multi-member "superdistricts" is another strategy which "modifies winner-take-all majority rule to require that something more than a bare majority of voters must approve or concur before action is taken."
everyone gets six votes.
you can vote once for six candidates, or six times for one candidate.
it sounds strange but not unfair.
“Whatever happened to one man one vote?”
It didn’t produce the correct result. We have moved beyond the reactionary concept of equal opportunity and now seek social justice by embracing the progressive requirement for equal outcomes.
I understand that the search function on this site is really poor, but seriously - this article was posted three of four times already.
For clarity, everyone in the city gets six votes, not just the hispanics. Everyone gets one vote, but they are voting with six points with which they can allocate across any of the candidates.
I am sure that the logic is that this will allow some candidates to get votes who would not have otherwise. However, I don’t think that this will really matter. The reason that no hispanic has been elected is because the community has a very large portion of illegal aliens who cannot vote.
Kind of illegal isn’t it?
I think you are missing the BIG picture.
Democrats and voter fraud are synonomous. They have no sense of honor, code of ethics or moral compass - to them winning is everything.
So, if each man gets 6 votes, and we know from history that fewer than 30% of the people bother to vote; you can legitimately steal 5 out of 6 votes from 70% of the population - and go undetected. Why? Because there is 1 remaining ‘vote’ per person - the 70% will be considered non-voting; yet the total number of votes will overwhelmingly go to the Democratic party candidate.
So, the dead won’t be flagged for voting once, because they will only cast 5/6th of a vote for the Democratic party candidate.
Why else would the Democrats want this? There is NO LEGITIMATE reason to do this.
This is not fair. Furano should have one vote. Now if they really wanted to fix the problem, the other alternative is to give the conservative white voters only a 1/6 of a vote. One vote for the Hispanics, 1/6 of a vote for the whites. There.
The bigger issue is how, with the stroke of a pen, the judge gets to change voting laws. Can you imagine if this starts to happen all over?
It seems that everyone gets six votes, just like they did in the past, since there are six seats to fill at large.
The only difference is that now each voter can cast all six of their votes for a single candidate if they want to.
It’s nothing to get alarmed about.
Ethnic Cleansing block by block.
One man one vote is the only way. One man 6 votes is CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The votes are supposed to reflect the wishes of the community, not just one nationality or minority.
I’m of English descent, and I want six votes because I am a minority.
What insanity....