1 posted on
06/15/2010 12:41:30 PM PDT by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: SmithL
2 posted on
06/15/2010 12:42:34 PM PDT by
demsux
(Obama: Killing Jobs Not Terrorists)
To: SmithL
Encouraging molesters is what this Judge has actually achieved.
3 posted on
06/15/2010 12:44:30 PM PDT by
SatinDoll
(NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
To: SmithL
And what would have been the sentence had he been a woman, I wonder... You know, with gender equality and everything.
4 posted on
06/15/2010 12:44:31 PM PDT by
kingu
(Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
To: SmithL
and that the use of violence to solve problems would only encourage more violence Yeah? Well maybe if these perverts thought they would get killed by one of their victims in the future, it might prevent them from molesting innocents in the first place. This makes me sick!
5 posted on
06/15/2010 12:46:54 PM PDT by
DallasDeb
(USAFA '06 Mom)
To: SmithL
the use of violence to solve problems would only encourage more violence The dead gay molester is going to become violent now?
To: SmithL
sounds like the judge is a NAMBLA member.
7 posted on
06/15/2010 12:47:08 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: SmithL
This was a revenge killing, not a killing in self defense. He deserved some jail time.
11 posted on
06/15/2010 12:49:54 PM PDT by
Tamar1973
(Freedom of the Press?! I need Freedom FROM THE PRESS!)
To: SmithL
Judges like Ronald Brown are the reason people take the law into their own hands. You can bet “Ronald” would have let the abuser off with a slap on the wrist. Since judges were lawyers first, most of them seem to lean towards giving breaks to the thugs and prosecuting victims to the full extent of the law for the mere act of defending themselves.
12 posted on
06/15/2010 12:50:34 PM PDT by
onevoter
To: SmithL
This sounds like murder one to me, frankly. Either we believe you can kill only in self-defense, or we don’t. The fact that the victim did something wrong to him years ago is irrelevant.
To: SmithL
FREE VARGAS!.......McNeill won’t molest another child, that’s for sure.
16 posted on
06/15/2010 12:57:05 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
To: SmithL
The shooter sounds very troubled (violence and drinking), which of course could be the result of molestation at the hands of the guy he shot.
Or the accusation could have come from the fact that the shooter was disturbed.
It seems likely that the guy abused him, but perhaps a trial and conviction were in order before the death penalty. I just like to know the right guy is dead before I absolve the shooter.
20 posted on
06/15/2010 12:59:10 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: SmithL
Liberals want pedophilia normalized, not punished.
23 posted on
06/15/2010 1:02:21 PM PDT by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: SmithL
Judge Ronald Brown said he imposed the harsher sentence because he believed Vargas had gone to McNeill's house with the intent to kill him, and that the use of violence to solve problems would only encourage more violence. Vigilante justice is a symptom of a failed justice system. A harsher punishment does not address the problem, but exacerbates it.
25 posted on
06/15/2010 1:03:17 PM PDT by
TheDon
("Citizen" of Kalifornia, USSA)
To: SmithL
I’d have sentenced him to two-weeks paid vacation in Vegas and a new car.
29 posted on
06/15/2010 1:07:16 PM PDT by
hometoroost
(Proverbs 8:36 - All those who hate me love death.)
To: SmithL
“A Northern California man who fatally shot a family friend accused of molesting him for years was sentenced Tuesday to nine years in prison in the vigilante shooting.”
Wrong. Justifiable homicide.
30 posted on
06/15/2010 1:07:32 PM PDT by
ZULU
To: SmithL
Settles up the accounts fair and square.
You diddle me, I kill you, I go to jail.
Everyone ought to have known the series of actions would follow one another.
31 posted on
06/15/2010 1:08:09 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(0bummer calls opponents "Teabaggers". So we can call Kagan "Carpet Muncher." Right?)
To: SmithL
He should have got no time.
33 posted on
06/15/2010 1:09:40 PM PDT by
Scythian
To: SmithL
Was this a jury trial? Did the jury find him guilty? A jury had the authority to find him innocent, had it wished.
To: SmithL
Another judge that should never have been on a bench
49 posted on
06/15/2010 1:33:24 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Political Correctness Kills)
To: SmithL
Wonder if the judge is this tough with real perps?
This guy should be kicked loose and given a medal and maybe some cash for saving the state some money.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson