Bork Oinkbama is not an American citizen in any way, shape, or manner, and the election of 08 needs to be annulled and declared void, and the office empty.
...
Bottom line: Sebelius means to dictate what your insurance plan must look like almost from day one, no matter how you get your coverage.
Indeed, the draft regs envision more than half of all policies having to change within three years — an unmistakable break with President’s Obama’s oft-repeated promise, “If people like their insurance, they will be able to keep it.”
Yet that may be the least of the broken promises.
...
Ultimately, these rules force consumers to buy one of just four health policies — which vary mostly only by trading off higher co-payments for lower premiums, while offering essentially the same actual benefits. In arguing for passage of the law, ObamaCare’s defenders claimed the rules were aimed at health plans sold in the “exchanges.” Oops: Now Sebelius is applying them to employer plans. Eventually, this would force all but the very wealthiest Americans into a single government-designed insurance scheme.
Obama told you!
Obama on single payer health insurance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE
If not, a constitutional convention could turn out to be less impracticable than any alternative means of destroying this beast.
Unbelievable.
People will learn the hard way that Obama and his legislative minions have been lying from day one both knowingly and deliberately.
Get ready to to mexico for quality doctors.
bump
If a conservative Republican is elected president in 2012, and has a Republican majority in the House and Senate, they had better repeal this hellish nightmare called Obamacare.
If the Republicans refuse to do so, then they should become extinct as a political party and the TEA Party should become an actual political party to replace the late not-so-great GOP.
The GOP can start by replacing Michael Steele.
Karl Marx smiles.
Any federal version of health care is unconstitutional since Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution does not specifically list regulating health care as an enumerated power! The people are not bound to comply with an unconstitutional act!
I waiting for the outcry from AARP.
Of course you are going to lose your plan...anyone who ever thought differently must also believe in santa Clause!!
We’re F’d.
my theory is that’s why he is about to fire up a major fight over Cap n Tax. Even if he loses it will take all the eyes off of this story.
At what level will this be tyranny. I say, it is there already.
At what level will this be tyranny? I say, it is there already.
btt
How much of a stretch is it to conclude that Obamacare will tie medical licensure to participation?
"Senate Bill 2170, filed by the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, would create an Affordable Health Plan for businesses with fewer than 50 employees. While the bill may sound well-intentioned, it unfairly burdens physicians while having minimal meaningful requirements for insurers.
The bill - which would be repealed on Jan.1, 2013 by a separate measure pending in the House - has two major failings.
One is that it ties a physician’s license to practice medicine to participation in this plan. The purpose of licensing, in any profession, is to ensure competency and protection of the public. No law should require physicians to follow the dictates of a health plan or risk the loss of their license. Physicians have a right to renew their professional license, and this right cannot be taken except for cause and after due process.
The Board of Registration in Medicine should not be mandated to revoke any qualified physician’s license on the basis of a contractual relationship with any insurer. Even Medicare and Medicaid do not make participation a condition of licensure.
The list, ping