Posted on 06/14/2010 1:40:54 AM PDT by tlb
A doctor certified by their own personal professional board, administered by his own wife. Now that's ingenious, if not particularly ethical.
If nothing else it appears to be an interesting insight into what sort of legislator he will be. Trainwreck coming 'round the bend.
What could be worse than RINO’s and Obama?
Board certification is a voluntary process....Doctors do not need to be certified to practice medicine in Kentucky
So...what exactly is the story here; besides the media's continued hatchet job?
If this was really written by a so-called professional journalist, the twit could at least have used a dictionary to find out how to spell “ophthalmologist.”
The Jack Conway-endorsing, third-rate fishwrap that is the Louisville Courier-Journal will be pulling this crap all between now and November.
If he has a Birth Certificate, he’s leap years ahead of what we have now.
Not good.
Exactly - that is “patetic”.
The reporter isn’t certified in spelling, as it surely is “ophthalmology,” not opthamology. Also, although not “board-certified,” he is undoubtedly “board-eligible” and licensed to practice.
More trash from a liberal “reporter” who in truth is not a journalist but a propagandist. He twisted the story to make Paul look bad intentionally. The fact that Dr. Paul has been board certified in the past, and evidently not had legal problems related to that and that he is employed at a hospital means he is probably fine ethically and legally on the issue.
Gee, a Libertarian who does not jump through unnecessary government hoops...who would have thought.
This is great news he refused to kowtow to the Doctors union and instead started his own.
Board Certified is not a doc’s union. It is a certification that you are what you say you are as a specialist. It is important and docs don’t lie about it or attempt to “invent” their own boards.
If he passed himself off as board certified as a specialist by a ruse, he is a dishonest man and untrustworthy.
To be board certified, you have the training necessary and have passed tests that evaluate your knowledge.
Uh... Who are the people that certify other doctors? Isn't the certification boards of all the doctor groups made up of other doctors?
Just who is it that makes up these boards and sets the certification rules? Would it be other doctors?
Board Certified is done by the specialist boards and is a way of knowing if a neurosurgeon has done a surgery and neurosurgery residency at an apprpoved program and has passed tests that evaluate his knowledge.
It is a process one goes thru after completing training.
You cannot do one year of surgery and pretend you have done four years. And you cannot be a dunce.
You can be a surgeon and not be board certified but most professionals regard it as a minimum to assure competency.
Some boards are hard to pass, some are easier but it requires at least minimum training and knowledge and usually a lot more. Docs sometimes take speciality boards over and over to pass them.
Sorry, the board is made up of a group of specialists for each speciality. Good docs, competent docs who are boarded themselves.
It is beyond a license to practice, beyond doing internship and residency. It is a demonstration of one’s competence to be what you say you are.
Paul quit the board after they changed the rules in 1992. Before then, once one was “board certified”, they remained that way for life. Instead, though, they changed the rules: to require younger doctors (like Paul) to be certified at $1,500 a pop every few years while the old-timer doctors were ‘grandfathered’ in.
Good for Paul.
Panel says candidate Paul not board certified (Rand Paul Certified himself)
Every time you think you've heard/read it all...
[Thanks, Slings and Arrows.]
So no real scandal for Rand Paul herre then? They sure are out to hurt this guy, aren’t they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.