Bad definition, in my opinion. Different words mean different things, else they wouldn't be different.
Example:
animal; a dog.
dog; an animal.
This is circular, and neither choice provides a clear distinction between the two words being defined.
A Native Born Citizen is not a Natural Born Citizen.
As the definition itself posits explaining LEGAL USAGE:
"There is no distinction between native born as used in the French Extradition treaty and natural born as used in the extradition act."
All of this is silly anyway--as the Supremes (or any other legal authority) will not allow the "natural born" of Obama issue to be touched with a ten foot pole--due to the horrendous implications, (which could include, false laws/treaties, terrible riots and even war, I think--coming out of certain communities.)
Just 2 and a half more years.... 1/20/2013!!!
Not always. English is a very bastardized language, and one of the harder ones to learn as well. But consider:
Dog, Canine, pooch.
Swine, hog, pig.
A Native Born Citizen is not a Natural Born Citizen.
Not in modern usage, but in 1928 and for that matter 1787, they were the same.