Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leisler
I would just like to know why he is not going through proper channels and really screwing the military by his refusal to go to Iraq/Afghanistan. it seems to me that if someone pulled this during Bush Presidency people would not be forgiving at all. In fact, some people did call it an illegal war and people here were yelling “crucify him”.
10 posted on 06/09/2010 12:57:58 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator; Leisler
"I would just like to know why he is not going through proper channels and really screwing the military by his refusal to go to Iraq/Afghanistan."

Look at post #8, or read the "Key Documents" on the lower right side of the site, for proof that he DID try to go through the proper channels...back in early/middle 2009!
They, the military brass AND his elected "representatives" (essentially) ignored him, like they've ignored the rest of us who have sought the proof the "one" is indeed a "Natural Born Citizen" as the Constitution requires.

13 posted on 06/09/2010 1:03:28 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

What else would a proper channel be? Ask up your chain who tells you to shut up and obey the CIC who you are sure is illegal? Ultimately his argument is that Obama *is not* his commander in chief due to ineligibility. For there to be a case, he must disobey an order. Then it can be tested in court.

Same as if he walked in one day and a high school ROTC kid was there in the commanders office, issuing orders. He has a right to know if this is legitimate. He has a legal obligation not to obey orders he believes to be illegal.


15 posted on 06/09/2010 1:08:56 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

What would the “proper channels” be, pray tell?


20 posted on 06/09/2010 1:14:24 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
I would just like to know why he is not going through proper channels

He did and he is.

and really screwing the military by his refusal to go to Iraq/Afghanistan.

He was working at a military hospital until the military told him not to show up. So just who is screwing who???

it seems to me that if someone pulled this during Bush Presidency people would not be forgiving at all.

Bush was a qualified Article II CiC -- Obama is not.

25 posted on 06/09/2010 1:18:12 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
I would just like to know why he is not going through proper channels

He tried, with no one giving him any evidence that BO is eligible for the office he occupies. Or even responding to his inquiries for the most part.

100 posted on 06/09/2010 4:36:18 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
“I would just like to know why he is not going through proper channels...”

As far as I know, Lakin did go through the proper channels of command and has all the documentation showing he was refused answers all along the way, which caused him to take the next step and put his excellent career on the line and even face Court Martial.

120 posted on 06/09/2010 6:24:50 PM PDT by seekthetruth (Dan Fanelli US House FL 8 --- Allen West US House FL 22 --- Marco Rubio - US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson