Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Gibbs says White House did not offer Joe Sestak intel post but refuses to provide details
the daily caller ^ | 6/1/10 | Jon Ward

Posted on 06/01/2010 4:18:58 PM PDT by Nachum

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs indicated Tuesday that Rep. Joe Sestak was not offered a spot on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board but refused to say what was dangled in front of the Democrat in an attempt to remove him from a Senate primary.

The spot offered to Sestak, Gibbs said to reporters at the White House, “didn’t constitute a lot of what you’re hearing.”

But Gibbs refused to clarify what Sestak, who won the May 18 primary and is now the Democratic nominee for Senate, was offered.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gibbs; intel; robert; sestak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Gibbs, the gift that keeps on giving.
1 posted on 06/01/2010 4:18:58 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 06/01/2010 4:19:23 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Gibbs is an unbelievable libtard.


3 posted on 06/01/2010 4:21:10 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They’re falling apart at the seams. They no longer know if they’re coming or going. Chaos is going viral. How can it end in anything except a trainwreck?


4 posted on 06/01/2010 4:23:20 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I see Gibberish is still being the good little propaganda minister for Comrade Barry. I wonder what his defense will be during his turn in the dock? I was only following orders? A lot of rope has been expended administering justice for that cop out.

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

5 posted on 06/01/2010 4:24:50 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The spot offered to Sestak, Gibbs said to reporters at the White House, “didn’t constitute a lot of what you’re hearing.”

The spot offered....is what BROKE THE LAW!

6 posted on 06/01/2010 4:27:45 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The whole dam pack of vermin is confused. They can't get their story straight and every day the company line changes in an attempt to fix whatever new inconsistency/lie needs to be addressed that day. This makes them look just like what they are: armatures in over their heads.
7 posted on 06/01/2010 4:28:05 PM PDT by skimbell (A vote for a democrat is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Listen to his further answer...’that he would have to check with counsel before answing that...’ Oh REALLY... what ya need a LAWYER for Gibbsey?

Why a lawyer when nothing was done wrong or inappropriate? Um hum.

((((((crickets))))))


8 posted on 06/01/2010 4:28:11 PM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

So much for “transparency.”


9 posted on 06/01/2010 4:31:10 PM PDT by cld51860
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I swear, if this was a Republican administration, the media would react like sharks to blood in the water. Since it’s a Dem, they are barely curious.


10 posted on 06/01/2010 4:33:29 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

The problem is that they’ll keep trying out answers on the MSM until they get one that sounds right and then the media will act like that was the answer all along. They’ll forget all of the lying and flip flopping around in the meantime. Just like they did with Slick Willie. I mean, who but an idiot would accept “it depends on what the meaning of is is”?


11 posted on 06/01/2010 4:33:44 PM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Gibbs, a mouthpiece only--that's all he's paid to do. He's just the messenger.

The less said, then they can't be caught up by the feds if an investigation + caught up in conflicting stories--aka called lying to the feds..."well I can't really rememeber the details"... scenario, "I may have said"--famous words... "I don't remember".

Remembers & miss Tony Snow...

12 posted on 06/01/2010 4:33:51 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

95% chance there’s an impeachable offense buried in this.

And they know it.


13 posted on 06/01/2010 4:34:01 PM PDT by ryan71 (Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This has to be investigated. Something smells to high heaven. These people have got to be put under oath and made to tell the truth.


14 posted on 06/01/2010 4:34:52 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It seems like I’m reading a Stephen King novel and the evil is literally destroying its host with BS weasels.


15 posted on 06/01/2010 4:39:21 PM PDT by RedMDer (Throw them all out in 2010... Forward with Confidence! Forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; Nachum

I’m sticking with Newt - now more than ever.

Gibbs is another weak link...lol.


16 posted on 06/01/2010 4:41:23 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Bring back Mike McCurry, he was the best slime salesman that I ever saw.


17 posted on 06/01/2010 4:45:55 PM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Either the administration was under the impression that Sestak could be bought off on the cheap, or everyone is lying. Imagine Sestak being played for a fool, and nodding his head like a toady. In the end, Joe, you sold your soul for far less than the alleged original offer.
18 posted on 06/01/2010 4:47:18 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We must have criminal investgations immediately against BP and Israel.

Sestak? Nothing to see here.


19 posted on 06/01/2010 4:51:05 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

It was Rove. He planted Specter as a deep sleeper agent, to be activated at the right time to bring down the entire Democrat apparatus. Now Specter can claim to be a double agent and get himself elected as the true heroic senator. /s


20 posted on 06/01/2010 4:51:28 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson