Palin endorsed Rand Paul, so I don’t think asking her questions about his statements is absurd. Palin is better at playing the victim than giving coherent answers.
But expecting her to answer questions about soundbite excerpts of his answers without the context of the entire conversation -- which she didn't here -- is silly. She wasn't in the interview room with him, didn't participate in his discussions of the issue, and probably had not spoken with him about the question, so why would she have any further insight into the conversation worth commenting on?
There was nothing to criticize Rand Paul for. He ios not a raaaacist, nor did he say anything that was raaaacist in nature. So your post shows that you agree with the liberal/media narrative and Alinsky tactics.
- JP