Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Source: Obama Ignorant of Sestak Bribe Attempt Until "Recent Days"
Friday, May 28, 2010 | Kristinn

Posted on 05/28/2010 7:10:02 PM PDT by kristinn

In reports that appear to have been missed in the flurry of reporting this afternoon on the Obama administration's release of a cursory report on its in-house investigation on the administration's attempted bribery of Rep. Joe Sestak, CNN's John King reported that a White House source told him Barack Obama was kept in the dark about the bribe attempt until "recent days."

Posting on Twitter around 1 p.m. EDT, King reported in three Tweets what his sources were telling him about the unfolding scandal:

WH Source: prez didnt know about rahm/clinton/sestak talks until recent days; GOP pressing for more details.

WH memo lacks important details. Source says COS Emanuel did not check with counsel office before enlisting Clinton. #sestak

Svl other WH aides knew of Emanuel/Clinton effort. WH memo doesn't mention. #sestak

King has not posted to his Twitter account since posting these three reports.

Is someone in the White House trying to create a case for Obama's innocence in the Sestak scandal? It sure looks that way. It's not credible, but it shows an acknowledgement by some in the Obama administration that Obama himself could be in serious trouble if he is found to have been involved in the Sestak bribe attempt.

This is looking more like the Watergate cover-up with each passing hour. (And we know how that ended.)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billclinton; joesestak; johnking; obama; sestak; sestakgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last
To: kristinn
"Was it [the job] high-ranking?" Kane asked. Sestak said yes, but added that he would "never leave" the Senate race for a deal.

And now the story is it was just an un-paid position.

Also note the first official response from the White House was to lie about a job offer to Sestak.

Why tell a harmless truth when you might get away with floating a lie? /s

81 posted on 05/28/2010 7:45:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
Maybe he’s trying to set up a defense that he was out of the loop on everything.

An excuse that would do him no favours. "No my fault, folks, because I don't know what the hell is goin' on in my administration."
82 posted on 05/28/2010 7:46:07 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Obummer......... “That’s just Not the Rhaum Emanuel I knew”


83 posted on 05/28/2010 7:46:22 PM PDT by sportscaster ("LET'S ROLL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I’m wondering if it was Dennis Blair’s job that was offered? Clinton glossed things over in a New Jersey senate race once before but he had the green light from the Obama on this baby.


84 posted on 05/28/2010 7:47:17 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Is Obama getting ready to throw Gibbs under the bus? Wasn’t he going to check on it?


85 posted on 05/28/2010 7:49:01 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Yeah, and Obama didn’t know about what his preacher, Rev Wright was talking about either in his own HATE MONGERING church where he sat for 20 years!


86 posted on 05/28/2010 7:49:57 PM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

Obama has selective hearing.


87 posted on 05/28/2010 7:50:31 PM PDT by tioga (Remember in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Clinton is Rahm’s Daddy! LOL.


88 posted on 05/28/2010 7:50:38 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Me too but we be stuck with plugs.


89 posted on 05/28/2010 7:52:35 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; All
"White House Source: Obama Ignorant of Sestak Bribe Attempt Until "Recent Days""

Photobucket

90 posted on 05/28/2010 7:53:37 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: kristinn

This administration is not intelligent enough to sit on this explanation this long. Accordingly, this is a total fabrication. I wonder what they had to give Bill to take the fall.


92 posted on 05/28/2010 7:54:11 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Just wait the next words out of O’s mouth will be executive privilege for dead fish.


93 posted on 05/28/2010 7:55:13 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

Likely right, but Rahm is still in Israel...getting jeered.


94 posted on 05/28/2010 7:57:36 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
White House source told him Barack Obama was kept in the dark about the bribe attempt

Did the White House actually use the words "bribe attempt"? Really? Wow.

95 posted on 05/28/2010 7:58:02 PM PDT by Pete (exponential problems require exponential solutions : 29thday.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Rahm is the key to the whole thing.


96 posted on 05/28/2010 8:00:07 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
This is hard to believe, since this incident first surfaced months ago. Are you telling me obamma was kept in the dark until recently? Impossible!!! I believe obamma was in on it at the get-go! This is the Chicago way! We need a special prosecutor!!!
97 posted on 05/28/2010 8:01:45 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; onyx
“Who’s Rahm’s Daddy?”

“It ain’t 0, IMO.

:)

Sure ain't MO, 'cuz she's O's daddy.

98 posted on 05/28/2010 8:02:04 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Worst Class Liars these people.

So, okay. . .It was all so innocent that they had to enlist Clinton to dicuss Sestak's career goals? We are to believe they enlisted a former Liar-in-Chief to 'map' our Sestak's career? And innocent (not) or otherwsie; given that Clinton is NOT part of this Administration then why would Clinton be involved, period. Why is he doing Obama's job or anything on his behalf. . .

Apparently, Obama,Inc. really do believe that ANYone, who is not in their inner circle, does in fact ride, in the back of the proverbial turnip truck.

I pray that sooner, rather than later; this turnip truck turns upside down on Obama, Inc.

99 posted on 05/28/2010 8:03:59 PM PDT by cricket (We ARE the Truman Show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Sestak offered prize from Cracker Jack Box: No Harm, No Foul

AP -- Pennsylvania Senate Candidate Joe Sestak finally admitted today that a former disbarred and disgraced President not actually connected to the current administration offered him the bird whistle from a box of Cracker Jacks in exchange for his not running against Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Democratic Senatorial Primary last May. Sestak contended that nothing illegal happened because the bird whistle "did not actually work," and "might have been handed to me during another part of the conversation."

According to a statement released this morning by the Office of the White House Counsel, the former President and admiral were walking down K-street last February chatting offhandedly while Mr. Clinton munched on the delicious snacks. "Joe, this is going to be a very difficult primary -- you might not want to run. Say... is Fort Marcy Park around here anywhere?" The former President found the prize near the bottom of the box, and, attempting to test the bird whistle apparently damaged the membrane. "You want this, Joe? I think it's broken."

Sestak agrees substantially with the WH account, and says that shortly thereafter Mr. Clinton dropped the subject and turned to commenting on the rear-ends of passersby. "The guy is a real horndog," Sestak recalls, "I mean gosh. It was February in DC, with winter coats and everything."

Pressed why he blew such an innocent happenstance into an allegation of bribery and corruption during the primary, Sestak remarked: "It was a Democratic Primary. They'll believe anything, you know? I mean, a government takeover of health care that will actually cover millions of uninsured people and save billions? I mean, COME ON. Anyway, I want to make clear that Mr. Clinton isn't part of this administration, even if his wife is, and just so you all understand, I did not even keep the bird whistle. In fact, I may not even have touched it at all. I barely even glanced at the thing as a matter of fact. So, there were no felonies, and if there were neither I nor any member of the present administration was involved. You can check with the White House. They'll tell you the same thing."

The eerily similar accounts have raised eyebrows in a town not typically esteemed for veracity, since if both parties are saying the same thing, surely it must be the absolute truth. Yet there did seem to be a problem with the timing, with Sestak claiming that the February date was "seared" into his memory, while the WH memo claims the contacts actually occurred in June or July of 2009.

Reached for comment later on the timing, Admiral Sestak seemed to back away somewhat from his earlier certainty. "What did I say? February? I've got a terrible memory for dates. If the White House claimed it was June it was probably June. Did I mention I was a three star Admiral who was only interested in serving the working families of Pennsylvania? Well I am. Could've been June. June... maybe July."

100 posted on 05/28/2010 8:04:36 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Ya got some Shabazz on the bottom of your shoes there, chum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson