To: rabscuttle385
And a Thesbian!!
2 posted on
05/27/2010 3:46:45 PM PDT by
NurdlyPeon
(Sarah Palin: Americas last, best hope for survival.)
To: rabscuttle385
Overtaxation is the reason we even have earmarks. Seems to me that McCain sits at the root of that problem.
3 posted on
05/27/2010 3:50:23 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: rabscuttle385
Give it up, McCain. Nobody is buying your BS!
To: rabscuttle385
Wasn’t he going to name names on pork, or something. I’ve yet to hear one name. McCain is getting pretty desperate. He should do the right thing for the country and drop out.
To: rabscuttle385
McCain fights to SAVE us money? Does he mean that by spending the $700 BILLION on TARP we SAVED money?
7 posted on
05/27/2010 3:54:37 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
To: rabscuttle385
Earmarks are over-rated. If you add up all the dollars spent on ear-marks and compare that to total federal spending, it is nothing, probably less than 1%.
Penny wise and pound foolish....that is what I think of when McCain talks about ear-marks. A good business person worries about the big expenses, not waste time on insignificant ones.
To: rabscuttle385
There is nothing quite so pathetic as this McAmnesty trying to paint himself as a hero of conservatism by smearing a true conservative.
Simply pathetic.
9 posted on
05/27/2010 4:06:48 PM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
("I AM JIM THOMPSON and moderates make me PUKE!!!")
To: rabscuttle385
When in school, he matriculated with dozens of co-eds, but soon he was visiting homeopaths and bilinguals. As a radio journalist, he frequented idiom dens, and has been photographed mounting a dappled ungulate.
To: rabscuttle385
Funny how that dumb SOB McCain thinks JD’s petty earmarks are more loathsome than his 2.8 billion dollar amnesty plan.
11 posted on
05/27/2010 4:18:12 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: rabscuttle385
I posted the following factual quotation to the CNN website. It does not have intemperate language nor is it racist.
QUOTE Chief Justice John Roberts said to the Obama Administration's Federal attorney defending McCain Fiengold: "If we accept your constitutional argument, we're establishing a precedent that you yourself say would extend to banning the book" - a hypothetical 500-page book containing one sentence that said "vote for" a particular candidate. UNQUOTE
15 posted on
05/27/2010 5:10:03 PM PDT by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: rabscuttle385
When the charge and counter-charge smoke clears away, the point remains that Hayworth is not McCain. McCain HAS to go. In six years Hayworth can be dumped but that will be six years without McCain.
16 posted on
05/27/2010 6:41:03 PM PDT by
Oatka
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson