When it comes to the nature of sex, there is no equality not in Human society or in nature. Women are the sellers of sex and men are the buyers. Women are the sellers because only young pretty women are in demand (which is the minority of most women. Women cease to be ‘sellers’ once they age and lose the youthful looks of fertility).
“Sluts” or “prostitutes” means “stupid woman”. The woman is so stupid that she is giving sex away or selling it at a very low price. Smart women sell sex at an extremely high price such as ‘marriage’ (e.g. the man becoming her wage slave).
The opposite is true for men because they are the buyers. A man who is able to get tons of sex for a low price or for free is considered ‘smart’.
There is no double standard here when you realize that women are the sellers and men are the buyers. When the sellers sell for little or nothing, they are declared ‘stupid’. When the buyer buys for little or nothing, they are declared ‘smart’. That is what the ‘slut’ and ‘stud’ difference is all about.
But what has that got to do with calling those women at that party ‘sluts’?
ps - I would have called them ‘rowdy’ ....
You Sir, are an economic genius. I would hate to see the calculations for the increased cost (mortgages, paying for well being of offspring) as well as the decreased output of sex that happens after marriage. Married women must be like Wil.E. Coyote, Super genius.
When the sellers sell for little or nothing, they are declared stupid.
When the buyer buys for little or nothing, they are declared smart.
That is what the slut and stud difference is all about.
A wise and sage analysis, my friend. Yours is one of the better posts I've seen on the forum in a very long time.