Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Signs Point to Administration Plan to Lock Up 13M Acres of Federal Land
fox ^ | 5/27/10 | Brian Wilson

Posted on 05/27/2010 9:59:38 AM PDT by Nachum

A leaked partial document produced by the Bureau of Land Management and obtained by Fox News suggests the Obama administration is considering a plan to lock up 13 million acres of land -- and the Department of Interior is refusing to answer questions.

First, a little background: The federal government owns about one-third of the land in the United States -- most of it in western states. For example, 84 percent of Nevada is owned by Uncle Sam.

But the government leases large parcels of federal land for all sorts of things -- grazing, mining, exploration, recreation.

Those commercial activities create jobs and tax revenue for the states. Tax revenues from commercial activity on federal lands often pays for local schools. However, with the single stroke of his pen, President Obama can use the Antiquities of Act of 1906 to turn federal land into National Monuments.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: administration; agenda21; aliens; hastings; interior; land; lock; signs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2010 9:59:39 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 05/27/2010 9:59:57 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

looking at these threads today, it is clear Obama is moving at breakneck speed to complete the takeover before November


3 posted on 05/27/2010 10:03:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

It really was from day one.


4 posted on 05/27/2010 10:06:54 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The land should belong to the state in which it is located. Not the federal government!


5 posted on 05/27/2010 10:07:33 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Maybe they are “locking up” this land to create construction jobs for the building of re-education camps for the TEA partiers?


6 posted on 05/27/2010 10:09:37 AM PDT by rfreedom4u ("A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

need to stop it


7 posted on 05/27/2010 10:09:38 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That land - and its resources - have already been pledged to China as collateral for our Treasury debt. No other way to keep them buying it.


8 posted on 05/27/2010 10:12:41 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
Maybe they are “locking up” this land to create construction jobs for the building of re-education camps for the TEA partiers?

Communists want to restrict freedom of movement, take all personal property, and make you come to them for every need. They want to box us in. Forever.

9 posted on 05/27/2010 10:12:53 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I must have missed it...exactly where in the Constitution is the federal government authorized to own as much as 84% of an entire state?

In fact, I think all that land the federal government holds might be part of the ticket out of their unfunded retirement liabilities. Since they're going to run out of money for all the SS funds because they wasted it in a Ponzi scheme, how about compensating with handing out that land to retiring people in lieu of some of the cash? I'd take some decent land if I could grow a garden on it and it wasn't more than 45 mins from a passable sized town...I know they hold tons of land I'd be happy with.

10 posted on 05/27/2010 10:13:31 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

The U.S. Constitution addresses the relationship of the federal government to
lands. Article IV, § 3, Clause 2 — the Property Clause — gives Congress authority
over federal property generally, and the Supreme Court has described Congress’s
power to legislate under this Clause as “without limitation.”


11 posted on 05/27/2010 10:19:38 AM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

“how about compensating with handing out that land to retiring people in lieu of some of the cash?”

uh, no. More likely go to the Chinese when we default and have nothing else of worth to give them.


12 posted on 05/27/2010 10:19:39 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (Where is the Black Regiment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
take some decent land if I could grow a garden on it and it wasn't more than 45 mins from a passable sized town.

There's plenty of private land available in western states where the population in small agricultural based towns has dwindled.

It ain't free but it is cheap....
13 posted on 05/27/2010 10:23:00 AM PDT by RedMonqey (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ken Saladbar

[[spit]]


14 posted on 05/27/2010 10:24:41 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl
More likely go to the Chinese when we default and have nothing else of worth to give them.

My thoughts exactly.

Some of that land has LOTS of coal/shale and other minerals of worth...
15 posted on 05/27/2010 10:25:32 AM PDT by RedMonqey (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
There's plenty of private land available in western states where the population in small agricultural based towns has dwindled. It ain't free but it is cheap....

Yup...but it doesn't address the fact that the federal government has no constitutional authority to hold the vast tracts of land they do. Those should either be sold to reduce the debt (and ONLY the debt...no spending), or they should be given out to willing recipients in lieu of the federal government defaulting on SS benefits already paid to the gov't.

16 posted on 05/27/2010 10:27:01 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Got some bad news for you. This land will soon be sold to China. <end sarcasm


17 posted on 05/27/2010 10:28:23 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Racial Profiling: Anti-Caucasian Racism hidden under a politically correct term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huck
The U.S. Constitution addresses the relationship of the federal government to lands. Article IV, § 3, Clause 2 — the Property Clause — gives Congress authority over federal property generally, and the Supreme Court has described Congress’s power to legislate under this Clause as “without limitation.”

That passage says...

The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations...

I understand you're saying that the SCOTUS has interpreted this to be unlimited control, but from reading the text, that seems to be another example of a "penumbra". Disposing is not holding onto...nor is making rules and regulations the same has holding land. I am not convinced that the constitution really gives authority of the federal government to hold land for any length of time. But I realize that the US is no longer a nation built upon the constitution...it's built upon a perversion of the constitution and moving away from even that.

18 posted on 05/27/2010 10:33:04 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I only got a glimpse of a report on Fox, but I “think” they reported that a much larger figure of 60 million.


19 posted on 05/27/2010 10:38:45 AM PDT by Gator113 (OBAMA THAT IS NOT SUSTAINABLE..... IMPEACH Obama NOW..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Enjoy sitting in Daddy's chair while you can, scumbags.

Daddy is coming home soon. And he is NOT AMUSED.

This is *our* land, not yours, you crypto-fascist impostors.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 05/27/2010 10:51:57 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson