Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuke the BP oil spill & environazis that get in the way, too much at stake

Posted on 05/21/2010 8:13:04 PM PDT by steve0

Nuke the BP oil spill drill hole, it will seal it just as the Russians have done at 9 other sites. Too much money and environmental damage is at stake and we can no longer allow PC & environazis to prevent the correct action from being considered and taken. Obama promised to use science in determination of policy, yet they have taken the nuclear option off the table.


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: doomed; dumbass; fruitloop; nowayjose; nuke; nutjob; vikingkitties; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
Conservatives need to get conserving our resources by taking immediate action now. We should no allow France to be seen as the leader in safe use of nuclear technology. We would save billions in oil, resources, wetlands, and prevention of food spoilage if we would implement proven nuclear technology now. Its only a matter of time before its clear to everyone that this is the cheapest and best option.
1 posted on 05/21/2010 8:13:04 PM PDT by steve0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve0

IBTZ?

Viking Kitties?

Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.


2 posted on 05/21/2010 8:18:27 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Why a zot? This is a serious topic, and it’s not too close to land. A mile of water does a lot to limit the range of damage, and a relatively small nuke would do the job.

The word “nuke” or “nuclear” scares people, though.


3 posted on 05/21/2010 8:22:14 PM PDT by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.

Really? Why? No fallout from a sub-seabed nuclear explosion. No fault lines to worry about. Let's stop being chickensh#ts about this and do what's right.

4 posted on 05/21/2010 8:23:02 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.”

How is it too close to land? How many nuclear weapons have we exploded in the west? There have been hundreds....


5 posted on 05/21/2010 8:23:58 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve0

IBTZ


6 posted on 05/21/2010 8:25:16 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Thank you!!. The reader makes my point we need to get away from the leftist propaganda that all nuclear technology is dangerous, polluting, toxic etc. We would feed millions more and save billions in dollars if we would only use Food Irradiation. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_irradiation

# 1970 Establishment of the International Food Irradiation Project (IFIP), head quarters at the Federal Research Centre for Food Preservation, Karlsruhe, Germany
# 1980 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Irradiation recommends the clearance generally up to 10 kGy “overall average dose”
# 1981/1983 End of IFIP after reaching its goals
# 1983 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: any food at a maximum “overall average dose” of 10 kGy
# 1984 International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) becomes the successor of IFIP
# 1997 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Study Group on High-Dose Irradiation recommends to lift any upper dose limit
# 2003 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: no longer any upper dose limit
# 2004 ICGFI ends


7 posted on 05/21/2010 8:26:08 PM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Just because the stuff that would otherwise be fallout doesn’t go into the air doesn’t mean it doesn’t go somewhere it is not particularly helpful. Also does the word tsunami mean anything to you?

Really, the best thing to do with the well would be to salvage it, even if another oilco has to do it because BP is so incompetent. However, the Bummer admin has nixed measures, such as barriers or oil dispersants (helps it biodegrade) that BP has suggested. It is just a fuster cluck.


8 posted on 05/21/2010 8:27:57 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve0

Irradiating food and exploding a nuke underwater are vastly different enterprises.


9 posted on 05/21/2010 8:30:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: piytar

This is in no way a serious topic for those of us old enough to remember real spills.

The tin foil hat crowd grows tiresome in short order.


10 posted on 05/21/2010 8:30:15 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes, but do both endeavors rely on the use of proven nuclear technology.


11 posted on 05/21/2010 8:32:34 PM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve0

Exploding a nuke on Bikini Atoll is not the same as doing it within 50 miles of populated mainland.


12 posted on 05/21/2010 8:33:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve0

Oh, and the Rooskies sealed gas wells, not oil wells.


13 posted on 05/21/2010 8:35:10 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I like how your so scientific and all dismissing it out of hand in a knee jerk fashion. All options must be on the table. This is proven technology. See: A first test in the fall of 1966 proved successful in sealing up a well in southern Uzbekistan, and so the Russians used nukes four more times for capping runaway wells.

“The second ‘success’ gave Soviet scientists great confidence in the use of this new technique for rapidly and effectively controlling ran away gas and oil wells,” according to a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) report on the Soviet Union’s peaceful uses of nuclear explosions.

A last attempt took place in 1981, but failed perhaps because of poor positioning, according to a U.S. Department of Energy report.” Thank you for proving my point about the anti-nuclear hysteria the left has spread to Americans. I suppose your against food irradiation?


14 posted on 05/21/2010 8:38:15 PM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve0
This should not be attempted.

It will be a catastrophic miscalculation.

For one thing, it will release Godzilla.

And for another, it won't kill enough hippies.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

15 posted on 05/21/2010 8:38:20 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Give up HTRN, too many folks here know nothing about oil wells and the only knowledge they have about nukes comes from movies and comic books.
16 posted on 05/21/2010 8:39:07 PM PDT by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Hippies? In Louisiana?


17 posted on 05/21/2010 8:42:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Nice, who should be zotted now? You insult all Freepers with your unscientific broad generalizations and stereotypes.


18 posted on 05/21/2010 8:42:44 PM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: steve0

Cajun’s FReep-age is enough to be your grandpa. And I could be your daddy.


19 posted on 05/21/2010 8:45:15 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: steve0

You lost any claim to science whatsoever when you started portraying this comparatively small well leak as a catastrophic disaster meriting apocalyptic solutions.

Are you an unemloyed anthropomorphic global warmist looking for a new gig?

Did you sell Y2K survival kits?


20 posted on 05/21/2010 8:46:18 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson