Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul jumps out to a 25-point lead in KY Senate race
HotAir.com ^ | May 20, 2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 05/20/2010 4:37:21 PM PDT by FTJM

The knock on Rand Paul from both Republicans and Democrats during the primary was his electability in a general election. His conservo-libertarian views would push the Republican ticket out of the mainstream, allowing the eventual Democratic nominee to grab the center and win a takeaway in the midterms. Rasmussen’s latest poll of likely voters in Kentucky show that the problem may be reversed, and that Jack Conway is in serious danger of being marginalized:

Rand Paul, riding the momentum of his big Republican Primary win on Tuesday, now posts a 25-point lead over Democrat Jack Conway in Kentucky’s U.S. Senate race, but there’s a lot of campaigning to go.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Kentucky, taken Wednesday night, shows Paul earning 59% of the vote, while Conway picks up 34% support. Four percent (4%) percent prefer some other candidate, and three percent (3%) are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; 2010polls; ky2010; paul; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 05/20/2010 4:37:21 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I fervently hope that Rand didn’t get his dad’s mental illness.


2 posted on 05/20/2010 4:39:12 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who rides on a scorpion should not be surprised when he last hears "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Eat it, Conway!


3 posted on 05/20/2010 4:40:41 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (No army can stop an idea whose time has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

The Fox Special Report panel was talking about Paul’s comments on the Civil Rights Act, and how he suggested that he agreed with it as it applied to government but disapproved of restrictions on private enterprise. The Fox panel was all huffy about this. Paul’s comments make sense to me, but are a lot of people offended by this? And what difference does it make? No one’s going to try to repeal the Civil Rights Act.


4 posted on 05/20/2010 4:44:23 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Republicans are getting good at knocking other republicans.

These pols ought to shut up.

Today ole Newt said after PA loss he doesn’t think we can take back congress.

How helpful.


5 posted on 05/20/2010 4:47:55 PM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Were we watching the same panel?

Kristol said it was no big deal. Mara is Mara and I have no clue as to what she was jabbering about but it didn’t seem huffy at all.

The only one huffy was Kraut, kind of sort of.


6 posted on 05/20/2010 4:49:17 PM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
Going on Maddow was a mistake. Not a huge, campaign-imploding mistake, but one where a candidate who is not part of the political establishment is prone to make.
7 posted on 05/20/2010 4:50:11 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rand is very pro life........ though he's a little nerdy looking.

One advantage is his gorgeous blonde wife.....she looks like a supermodel.

ON VIDEO http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8688383.stm

Kelley Ashby was a Rhodes College English major. Paul and Ashby were married in 1991, and moved to Bowling Green, Kentucky, less than 30 miles from her hometown of Russellville, Kentucky, in 1993.

Kelley Paul is a freelance writer, and she manages payroll and marketing communications for Paul's surgical practice. The couple have three sons: William, Duncan, and Robert.

Contrary to widespread speculation, Paul was not named after Ayn Rand, according to Paul himself.

8 posted on 05/20/2010 4:50:20 PM PDT by Liz (If teens can procreate in a Volkswagen, why does a spotted owl need 2000 acres? JD Hayworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

That PA race is being way over analyzed.


9 posted on 05/20/2010 4:50:21 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley
The only one huffy was Kraut, kind of sort of.

Mara and Charles were the ones who seemed to think it was a big deal. You're right - Mara is Mara - but I think Charles is an establishment guy who disapproves of Paul on principle.

10 posted on 05/20/2010 4:51:28 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

This is another good example of Sarah Palin’s advice. She said we don’t need to move left to attract the moderates. Let them come to us. Those brave enough to ignore the political consultants are finding out she is right.


11 posted on 05/20/2010 4:52:36 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
I've been outside all day, and just heard about this “flap” on Shemp Smith's 7 o'clock report. From what I heard, the Louisville lib paper had been sitting on some Paul's comments made last year. This smacks of “circle the wagons” lib desperation based upon these polls...
12 posted on 05/20/2010 4:53:57 PM PDT by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

One really wonderful result that would occur if Rand Paul won the senate is not having to look at all those damn pictures of shrimp every time someone mentions their name.


13 posted on 05/20/2010 4:57:42 PM PDT by AK_47_7.62x39 (There are many moderate Muslims, but there is no such thing as a moderate Islam. -- Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Excellent.


14 posted on 05/20/2010 4:58:46 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I have noticed the attempt by the media to slam him for his statements regard Civil Rights legislation (legacy legislation no less). The media KNOWS they need to take down this guy. I smell a litle fear....I like!


15 posted on 05/20/2010 4:59:58 PM PDT by austinaero ((More Bark, Less Wag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Seems we heard all of this in 2007 and 2008 about how his Dad was out in front and winning every poll.

From Rasmussen’s page, “This statewide telephone survey of 500 Likely Voters in Kentucky was conducted on May 19, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports.”

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/kentucky/election_2010_kentucky_senate


16 posted on 05/20/2010 5:00:44 PM PDT by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You know what bothers me? I’m just a little layperson, but as a conservative, I would never agree to an interview on MSNBC, much less with Maddow. The level of naivety is stunning.


17 posted on 05/20/2010 5:01:27 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

I think it is manufactured contraversy. No one really believes Paul would repeal the civil rights act and those who suggest it is so or feed the mock liberal outraged should be ashamed. There are a lot of things in the act that were not within the scope of the federal government to regulate and it set the path for the identity politics rot that is being used to strip away our rights to choose with whom and what behaviors we will associate with. Rand should just stop responding to this and just leave it and call it a ridiculous attack which is what it is.


18 posted on 05/20/2010 5:01:32 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Now if I could learn how to spellllll


19 posted on 05/20/2010 5:01:50 PM PDT by austinaero ((More Bark, Less Wag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

>>but as a conservative, I would never agree to an interview on MSNBC, much less with Maddow. The level of naivety is stunning.<<

He certainly got his old man’s ego.


20 posted on 05/20/2010 5:10:28 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who rides on a scorpion should not be surprised when he last hears "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson