Posted on 05/14/2010 5:38:04 PM PDT by truthkeeper
A preview of Fox News Sunday's interview with Chris Wallace.
"I think it's great...I like to have women on the Supreme Court...I just like women to represented in all parts of American political and civic life."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
>>But what do you think an ex-President’s wife was going to say >>
How about “I’m here to talk about my book, not the Supreme Court nominee”.
you pegged it. it must be that patrician new england breeding.
Oh Laura, I thought we knew ya.....our bad.:(
Foolish! Bush pere gave us Clinton, and W gave us Obama! No more Bushes ever again!
She was a fine First Lady. Now she can sell her book or wares or whatever (to who, I have NO idea)...but I won’t buy it.
She just set women back a 100 years. Thanks Laura. I have always thought Bush 1 was a democrat; but this.
I am sick of people lying just because they happen to be in the government.
Re read my post please.
Ah, I get it. There are two ways it can be interpreted! I’ve been fighting too many Palin smears, it seems. Carry on!
The right person for the job is not going to be nominated by Obama.
>>>she’s gone over to the Dark Side
Wasn’t she the one responsible for the HUGE increase in the Dept. of Education expansion in Bush’s first year in office?
I will not but her book of GWB’s Book.
GWB screwed Scooter Libby when he failed to give him a pardon.
You do? "Historical rankings of United States Presidents by scholars considering presidential achievements, leadership qualities, failures and faults, consistently place Buchanan among the worst presidents, if not the worst, in U.S. history" Wikipedia
But I haven't figured out by which one, yet.
Leni
You aren’t a Freeper, are you?
Didn’t think so.
Good Lord, Laura! Wake up and smell the Alinsky soup that Obama’s cooking. You can not have a respect for Natural Law and God’s Law (in our Founding docs, Laura, dear) and force people to “respect” a nihilistic behavior and indoctrinate our little three and four year olds into the worldview that men having sex with each other is “good” and “healthy”. Marxism promotes lies, Laura, dear. It rewrites the BIBLE! Worse, it destroys the Bible and destroys the freedom of religion.
Our laws were based on the Bible and it is the best country in the history of the world. It worked, Laura, superior to EVERYTHING ever tried on earth in civil society, until the progressive systematically started destroying the “living” document (including your father-in-law and husband). The Marxist ideas pit groups against groups, dear. They want a revolution. They want to destroy America so they can have a one world government. Are you trying to help?
What are you trying to do, then? Do you think you are compassionate in allowing lust to be elevated to a right? What about bi-sexuals? They want three people in their marriage. Where does this end? You elevate every sexual behavior to a right? That eliminates the possibility to have a moral code of behavior. It makes it impossible to practice true Christianity in the public square and bring children out into the public or watch any media. It will force every Christian to keep their children out of public school since the schools will be forced to promote every type of sexual union as good.
VERY SICK, dear Laura. You would get Sodom and Gomorrah. Will good Christians have to hide and not participate in public? Do you know how disgusting and demeaning gay pride parades are? How extremely sick it is to expose young developing, impressionable minds to such destructive, immoral behavior? Have you not read about societies with no sexual morality such as pagan Rome’s who had orgies and child sacrifice? Oh, such fun, you must think, Laura!
Children have the natural right to be raised by a biological mother and father. It is the best, both emotionally and physically for children and for a civil society. You are trying to put into law something that takes away their biological rights...Unconstitutional, Laura, dear. Where is your compassion for a child?
Are you a Marxist and think there is no difference between a mother and father? Are you nuts? Do you think there is any difference between a bull and a cow? How about a rooster and hen? Where is your logic, dear Laura? Oh, I guess little Marxist minds think there is no difference, therefore, why not allow two men to marry—it’s all the same, isn’t it. Screw the kids, though, huh, Laura, cause selfish lusts really do create happiness and what children need is unimportant. Ha ha, they can’t vote anyway.
Why do you think the Marxist hijacked the homosexual movement, dear Laura? Maybe to pit men against women. Kill the family unit—which made America the strongest, healthiest nation in the history of the world. Heterosexual marriage unites the sexes, if you haven’t noticed. It creates the perfect bond to prevent pathologies in children. Society can easily document that dear, Laura, if you bother to read any adult literature. Look what type of family structure created the vast majority of criminals.
Don’t you think legalizing something that discriminates against an entire group is hateful? Look at how Sparta treated women, dear Laura. Look how they had to initiate young boys into their homosexual lifestyle. Training and conditioning is all part of the lifestyle, you know. Look at that sweet little NAMBLA group that says if not by eight, then it is too late. You do know there is no gay gene, don’t you? Do you think baby rapists learn their orientation by genes or do you think they were abused as young children. Come on, dear Laura, I know common sense is not available in Marxist ideology, but do you honestly think a behavior is NOT learned?
Come on, Laura! Quit pretending you are smarter than God. That is truly evil.
Dear Laura, wake up for your grandkid’s sake and smell the rotten soup you are gulping! You are making me gag!
Robert's what?
This is the same moron who cheered on the Sotomayor nomination and accused Harriet Myers opponents of being sexist.
“I like women on the Supreme Court.” what a nitwit. She probably likes Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, too.
That’s a given. I meant Laura and her gushing about woman being in all areas, blah, blah. Her focus is on gender - how weak.
Instead say - who ever is best for our country and values the sacrifice of all who died for our freedom and The Constitution is followed.
Good one. And we are told few find the narrow path.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.