Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC

“Palin haters aren’t offering “criticism,” they are trying to detroy her, on a personal level if needed.”

“You are pushing the misnomer that I have called everyone who criticizes Palin a hater, which I have not done...Nobody is saying any such thing...”

Thanks for clarifying, however you made the ‘Palin haters’ comment at the end of a long list of quoted FReepers. Perhaps you needed to clarify who/what it applied to, don’t you think? Now we’re just left to pick and choose which of those comments and people you think is hateful?


31 posted on 05/14/2010 6:04:45 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: SeattleBruce
Here's a hint:

People who call her an “Enemy of the USA,” “Whore,” “Stupid,” “Less coherent than a monkey,” “Airhead,” “Failed mother,” etc. are likely candidates to be classified as “haters.”

It's really not that difficult to decipher. “Not feeling Sarah's up to the job” is a criticism worthy of debate; “Sarah Palin is an enemy of the USA” is not criticism, it is hatred.

That applies to any good Conservative. If someone were to try and post that Jim DeMint was an “enemy of the USA” for endorsing Mitt Romney and co-chairing Lindsey Graham's Senate campaign, I would also call them a DeMint “Hater.”

35 posted on 05/14/2010 6:10:48 PM PDT by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson