Posted on 05/14/2010 9:10:18 AM PDT by pissant
Fellow conservatives, please welcome US Senate candidate from the great state of California, Lt. Colonel Chuck DeVore!
Chuck is THE candidate in the race for the GOP Senate nomination who has a proven track record of both fiscal and social conservatism. He is pro-life, pro-gun, pro-God, and equally important, strictly pro-Constitution. He is currently serving his third term in the California Assembly and is a Lt. Colonel in the US Army Reserve.
Chuck also was a Ronald Reagan appointee to serve as Special Assistant for Foreign Affairs in the Pentagon from 1986-88. And Chuck shares the Gipper’s philosophy on governance and politics. Some of the folks who have endorsed Chuck’s campaign for US Senate include SC Senator Jim DeMint, radio superstar Mark Levin, California congressman Tom McClintock, and recently retired rock-ribber, Duncan Hunter.
If you have seen the debates, you know that Chuck is quick on his feet, self assured, and most importantly, a genuine conservative
Chuck has been married to his wife Diane for the last 22 years, and they have two wonderful daughters, Amy and Jennie.
So stop by, say hello, and ask any follow-up questions you want. Chuck will be here for about an hour and will answer as many as he can in that time. He can always come back and answer the ones he does not have time for today. And please consider supporting this man, who will vastly improve the US Senate from the moment he walks in the door.
(NOTE: The first 10 questions were answered this AM by Chuck and I included them below for expediency)
**********************
So here are the initial 10 Q&As:
1) Some of your opponents’ supporters have tried to slander you as having a ‘Ron Paul’ foreign policy when it comes to Islamic jihadists, particularly in regards to Afghanistan. Will you please tell us how you would like the US to act in Afghanistan, and furthermore, how you want us to go after the terrorists worldwide?
Afghanistan is not Iraq. The challenges there are very different. Nation building will be a long, open-ended and arduous task. I have constantly said we need to remorselessly kill our enemies, rather than nation-build in a hostile land. For this, we need special forces, human intelligence and drones, not a large conventional force that we promise to soon pull out. Nation-building in Afghanistan will be costly and frustrating. Meanwhile, do to cost pressures, the Obama Administration has canceled a host of important weapons modernization programs.
2) What would you like to see happen with the US relationship to the UN? Keep it the same? Get out altogether? Something in between?
The UN is more trouble than it is worth. If we want to be part of an international organization, why not a group of democracies who enjoy rule of law?
3) In one of your interviews recently, you noted that a real existential threat to the US is China. Former Congressman Duncan Hunter sees the same thing. What changes would you work for as Senator regarding the United States policy and relationship with China?
I would like to consider going back to annual most favored nation status votes. China is a growing strategic threat, both militarily and economically. They have historical grievances with their neighbors and the West. They are rapidly modernizing their military. Lastly, they have manipulated their currency and tax laws to gain a built in export advantage over their trading partners.
4) Do you support the Right to Life Act, defining personhood and therefore conferring Constitutional protections to unborn children? Would you support a constitutional amendment defining such if the courts vacated the Right to Life Act (assuming it passed)?
Yes, but it will be very tough to enact, needing a two-thirds vote to pass out of the Senate and House. In the meantime, we need to do all we can to curtail abortions in America.
5) What is your belief regarding the original intent of the Second Amendment? And do you support that today?
The Second Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, confers an individual right to keep and bear arms. I have a proven “A” rating from the NRA in six years of voting in Sacramento.
6) Your answer during the debates regarding a ‘pathway to citizenship’, better known as McCain’s Amnesty, was superb in that you want to require illegal aliens to leave and get in back of the line. However, once deported, they very often then sneak right back in. Do you support the original Secure Fence Act that was designed to put up another 854 miles of double fence with a Border Patrol road between throughout the smuggling corridors of the SW states? Also, what other enforcement activities, if any, do you recommend to curtail the illegal border crossings?
We need to complete a physical barrier – the virtual fence is virtually worthless. We need to maintain the size of the Border Patrol, not reduce it and, when and where needed, we need to augment the border once again with the National Guard.
7) Most members of Free Republic have their own lists of Federal Government Departments and Bureaus they would like to see eliminated. Can you identify a few Departments or Bureaus or programs you would like to see either eliminated altogether or devolved to the States?
Let’s return education dollars back to the states by eliminating the middle man, the Department of Education. The Department of Energy is also very wasteful, send the stewardship of nuclear weapons back to the Department of Defense and eliminate the Department of Energy.
8) What is your criteria for voting in favor of confirmation for a Supreme Court Justice? Or conversely, what would keep you from confirming a SCOTUS nominee?
One determiner: what is their view of the Constitution and the role of government as defined by it? Example: when Sonia Sotomayor said “empathy” played a big role in her decision making, that was a red flag for me as empathy has no role in rule of law. Further, her overturned decision in Ricci v. DeStefano (the firefighter case) was very revealing. I am the only Republican running who has consistently said from the start that I would have voted against confirming Sotomayor.
9) What role, if any, should the Federal Government have in education?
There is no specific Constitutional role for the federal government for education – although, as we saw in the Northwest Ordinance, the early Congress did see education as important. Education is best left up to the states and localities.
10) What are the top three attributes that you believe you possess that recommends you over your two primary opponents in the race to face Barbara Boxer for the US Senate election?
Philosophical clarity and confidence, combined with a tenacious ability to communicate a vision of limited government in a compelling way.
Thanx for your work on this. I didn’t know these candidate threads happened. It makes the site strong and worth the time.
I thought that went well. These things are fun to do.
Thank you very much, Col Devore. I have my absentee ballot in hand and I’m casting it today for Chuck Devore!! I urge all of my California FRiends to do the same!!
Thank you, Sir, and thank you very much for your service to God, Family, Country!!
Good luck against Madam Boxer!!
Thank you, pissant and CounterCounterCulture. Great thread!!
Thank you, pissant, for setting this up. And Thank you Jim Robinson, too!
Enjoyed this!
And I even behaved! LOL
There’s a time for joking; there’s a time for silliness. This was not that. This was a time for good questions so we all could get to know this marvelous man. :)
Yes. Thanks guys. Don’t know how you pulled this off but it was good to see the real deal coming through here.
Please take this wonderful advice from onyx!
Which is a great segue to my question.
What are your thoughts on comity in the senate and collegiality within congress?
Welcome to Free Republic! I’m from San Diego too. I will be ‘home’ in time to vote. I’m very happy you found FR!
Agreed, Sir. Surveying the broader landscape of U.S. environmental policy, though, is not the very point you articulate -- that people ought to be more highly considered in environmental law and ensuing policy -- the thinly-veiled antithesis of it all?
Consider that Progressive environmentalist language consistently deprecates mankind in the face of any and every natural complication, EXCEPT where people are actively doing the things that environmentalists have pre-defined as "saving the planet". Not only is the human race otherwise absent from environmental law and policy; not only are human needs ritually forced to the back of the Big Green bus, but wherever man can be demonized over environmental problems, he is.
How, then, would you approach driving a fundamental change to the anti-human sentiment that currently permeates the language of our environmental law and policy? How would you successfully energize the too-often stoic GOP Regulars and engage them in "talking up man" at the environmental table?
Thanks for providing a forum that can be used to communicate without all the hoopla of press conferences and debates... and doesnlt exclude anyone... except rabid liberal and Rino supporters.
Thanks for providing the thread and pics and decorum!!
Chuck, Thanks for your service to your country and your state.
The linked answer was fielded in your ballpark.
Bring back the days of open carry in the Senate! An armed Senate is a polite Senate!
Will you support requiring the NRSC in future taking a "hands-off 'til after primaries" approach?
We're 9 blocks from the beach. Doncha hate this weather?
You can trust me ... ask Jim!
He had to leave to go make a speech. He’s super, isn’t he?
I hope he read my post and I think he did. He can pull it off, too. Boy, will she be MAD and that will throw her off her game.
Ha didn’t know you were a freeper! Good-luck. All I can do from here is watch and comment. Hopefully you will be able to go to Congress and help shake things up some for us. :)
That’s also illegal, my friend. :( No chance I’m violating the law. I take this stuff serious!
Welcome to FR, Catracks. Hope you’ll stick around and share.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.