Posted on 05/14/2010 9:10:18 AM PDT by pissant
Thanx for your work on this. I didn’t know these candidate threads happened. It makes the site strong and worth the time.
I thought that went well. These things are fun to do.
Thank you very much, Col Devore. I have my absentee ballot in hand and I’m casting it today for Chuck Devore!! I urge all of my California FRiends to do the same!!
Thank you, Sir, and thank you very much for your service to God, Family, Country!!
Good luck against Madam Boxer!!
Thank you, pissant and CounterCounterCulture. Great thread!!
Thank you, pissant, for setting this up. And Thank you Jim Robinson, too!
Enjoyed this!
And I even behaved! LOL
There’s a time for joking; there’s a time for silliness. This was not that. This was a time for good questions so we all could get to know this marvelous man. :)
Yes. Thanks guys. Don’t know how you pulled this off but it was good to see the real deal coming through here.
Please take this wonderful advice from onyx!
Which is a great segue to my question.
What are your thoughts on comity in the senate and collegiality within congress?
Welcome to Free Republic! I’m from San Diego too. I will be ‘home’ in time to vote. I’m very happy you found FR!
Agreed, Sir. Surveying the broader landscape of U.S. environmental policy, though, is not the very point you articulate -- that people ought to be more highly considered in environmental law and ensuing policy -- the thinly-veiled antithesis of it all?
Consider that Progressive environmentalist language consistently deprecates mankind in the face of any and every natural complication, EXCEPT where people are actively doing the things that environmentalists have pre-defined as "saving the planet". Not only is the human race otherwise absent from environmental law and policy; not only are human needs ritually forced to the back of the Big Green bus, but wherever man can be demonized over environmental problems, he is.
How, then, would you approach driving a fundamental change to the anti-human sentiment that currently permeates the language of our environmental law and policy? How would you successfully energize the too-often stoic GOP Regulars and engage them in "talking up man" at the environmental table?
Thanks for providing a forum that can be used to communicate without all the hoopla of press conferences and debates... and doesnlt exclude anyone... except rabid liberal and Rino supporters.
Thanks for providing the thread and pics and decorum!!
Chuck, Thanks for your service to your country and your state.
The linked answer was fielded in your ballpark.
Bring back the days of open carry in the Senate! An armed Senate is a polite Senate!
Will you support requiring the NRSC in future taking a "hands-off 'til after primaries" approach?
We're 9 blocks from the beach. Doncha hate this weather?
You can trust me ... ask Jim!
He had to leave to go make a speech. He’s super, isn’t he?
I hope he read my post and I think he did. He can pull it off, too. Boy, will she be MAD and that will throw her off her game.
Ha didn’t know you were a freeper! Good-luck. All I can do from here is watch and comment. Hopefully you will be able to go to Congress and help shake things up some for us. :)
That’s also illegal, my friend. :( No chance I’m violating the law. I take this stuff serious!
Welcome to FR, Catracks. Hope you’ll stick around and share.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.