Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: TornadoAlley3
Now that is an idea worth considering. I often see food stamps buying more soda than I can afford.
2 posted on
05/14/2010 5:56:53 AM PDT by
o_zarkman44
(Elect Chuck Purgason, US Senate, Missouri! http://www.purgasonforsenate.com/)
To: TornadoAlley3
HA! Like to see ‘em try! This Congress appears to fear the people in no way (except of course an angry mob of Pepsi or Mountain Dew-deprived welfare recipients rioting in the streets!)
To: TornadoAlley3
Should just go back to “free food” handouts. Direct distribution of foodstuffs. Worked great for us when my father lost his job back in the early ‘60s.
4 posted on
05/14/2010 5:57:37 AM PDT by
catman67
To: TornadoAlley3
not to mention...what about our vaunted Ethanol Lobby of Corn Farmers and Grain Belt Congresscritters? You start shutting down demand for HFCS and there is gonna be HELL to PAY!
To: TornadoAlley3
I assumed it already wasn’t allowed. Does this mean that food stamps can be used to purchase chips, ice cream and candy, too? Good grief.
7 posted on
05/14/2010 5:59:47 AM PDT by
Spudx7
To: TornadoAlley3; Little Bill
Meanwhile, steak and lobster are perfectly fine. I see shopping carts full of that stuff and the like on the first weekend of the month, paid for with EBT cards, pushed out to near-new "dualie" trucks, then hear the same people bitch about how they're not making it because they're not given "enough."
Whatever happened to the old expression, "Whoever shall not work, neither shall he eat?"
12 posted on
05/14/2010 6:03:56 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
To: TornadoAlley3
They'll just trade them...there's no point to it.
And guess what...milk has calories, too.
To: TornadoAlley3
I’d like to see soda banned from food stamps but for a completely different reason. Take away soda, sweets, salt, potato chip type snacks etc. Piss these leaches off and see if any decide to work for a paycheck!
19 posted on
05/14/2010 6:06:31 AM PDT by
albie
To: TornadoAlley3
When Pepsico spent untold millions of dollars changing their logo to resemble the Obama “Hope and Change” icon, somehow I can’t see where this is ever gonna happen.
To: TornadoAlley3
How about the only thing you should be allowed to buy with food stamps is milk, eggs and grain in bulk?
OK, I'll include fruit and veggies too.
23 posted on
05/14/2010 6:09:21 AM PDT by
Tribune7
(It is immoral to claim the tea parties to be racist)
To: TornadoAlley3
I would argue caloric soda should be made ineligible for purchase under SNAPThis is ironic. They want to remove choice when people select food products, but they want to allow choice when it comes to abortions.
If they're successful doing this, it seems to me a precedent would be established for reversing Roe v Wade.
25 posted on
05/14/2010 6:10:17 AM PDT by
Real Cynic No More
(The mighty zero, obama,does not warrant the respect necessary for his name to be capitalized.)
To: TornadoAlley3
I heard a politically correct diet dictator on FOX yesterday saying that the obesity problem was mostly a poor or disadvantaged problem. I thought the same thing as Patterson - prohibit food stamps from buying junk food. That way, the people remain free, and the obesity among the one-a-month crowd is corrected.
If the once-a-monthers are going to sell their souls to the Devil, then they're going to have to pay their union dues with a pound of flesh - literally.
To: TornadoAlley3; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; genetic homophobe; ...
I honestly didn't know they can buy soda with food stamps. Idiots! I know there are sugary cereals they cannot buy with food stamps because I see the new immigrants that cannot read English holding up the express line at my food store.
At the same time they wanted to put a federal tax on our soda to pay for Health Reform. Idiots #2
31 posted on
05/14/2010 6:13:41 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: TornadoAlley3
35 posted on
05/14/2010 6:16:00 AM PDT by
fml
To: TornadoAlley3
I have a friend who is a clerk in a food store. She said those with gub’ment food cards buy the expensive crackers, chocolates, etc. that she can’t afford to buy. So much for subsidies.
To: TornadoAlley3
No stamps for Nehi Grape Soda? None for Kools cigarettes? What’s next- none for Barbecue Potato Chips?
To: TornadoAlley3
Hey, I have a better idea.
Congress should 'look at' banning all food stamp purchases
42 posted on
05/14/2010 6:21:48 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
To: TornadoAlley3
When you eat goobermint chit, you eat the chit they give ya.
Try explaining that to one of the "i'm gettin' over" class and you get a less than blank look.
45 posted on
05/14/2010 6:27:12 AM PDT by
metesky
(My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
To: TornadoAlley3
Ban Food Stamps. They are illegally traded for booze, prostitutes, and cash.
Open commodity stores where nutritious foods would be given to the poor to be cooked at home...no Sara Lee cakes, Cokes, chips etc. Obesity would be halted in its tracks.
If the government is telling us what to eat, it should only pay for caloric necessities, not fattening frills, in their feeding programs.
To: TornadoAlley3
you should only be able to buy the staples with food stamps, just enought to keep you alive.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson