Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fathers1

Parental rights has always meant the Mother’s rights. It’s about time Father’s rights were figured into the equation.


2 posted on 05/13/2010 12:28:39 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republic of Texas

Traditionally, until the mid 20th century, the father’s rights were always supreme. Why do you think it changed? What would be the proper balance?


4 posted on 05/13/2010 12:31:15 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Republic of Texas

I’m sure the dad will get custody. I have friends who were foster parents to a new born baby. They took care of the baby straight from the hospital after the birth for an entire year. They couldn’t wait to adopt her, but the grandmother decided at the last minute she wanted to adopt the baby (took grandma a year to make up her mind, but she did). Custody was given to the grandmother, my friends were heartbroken, but this is what happened. (They later ended up adopting a beautiful baby girl from China : )


49 posted on 05/13/2010 1:51:26 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Republic of Texas

Actually, I think that unless father is married to mom, he has no rights. Sperm donor only. Men who are not married to moms should never have parental rights, instead the woman should be pressured to give up custody of the child to adoption.


70 posted on 05/13/2010 7:11:43 PM PDT by Chickensoup ("A corrupt society has many laws" - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson