Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/11/2010 8:11:44 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: raybbr
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From David Horowitz's
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org

PROFILE: ELENA KAGAN

As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled

"To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933."

In the "Acknowledgments" section of her work, she specifically thanked her brother Marc, “whose involvement in radical causes led me to explore the history of American radicalism in the hope of clarifying my own political ideas.” In the body of the thesis, Kagan wrote:

"In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?...

"Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope."

Lots more on Kagan here:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398


2 posted on 05/11/2010 8:12:23 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Jesus... she’s toeing the Obama line with every talking point he’s muttered. This woman(?) needs to be filibustered or denied. 25 - 30 years of this sort of liberalism would be devastating to our country and our Constitution.


3 posted on 05/11/2010 8:13:37 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Audio of her idiocy at the link.....


4 posted on 05/11/2010 8:14:38 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Just what we need- a dumbass butch on the supreme court

There can be no doubt Obambi is trying to ruin this country for good.


5 posted on 05/11/2010 8:15:37 AM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

just another example of social justice and the progressive parties drive to put their people in all places, irregardless of their qualifications.

like the current resident, this person is just not qualified.


6 posted on 05/11/2010 8:15:42 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
Solicitor General Elena Kagan muffed her argument in front of the Supreme Court

Heh heh, they said "muffed".

7 posted on 05/11/2010 8:19:00 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Standing in front of the Bench is a hell of a lot different than sitting behind the Bench and attempting to enforce the Constitution.


10 posted on 05/11/2010 8:22:20 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

I formally request that we avoid using her name and “oral” in the same sentence. Thanks.

SnakeDoc


11 posted on 05/11/2010 8:23:59 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant [...] that even a god-king can bleed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Political Hack!


16 posted on 05/11/2010 8:26:45 AM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (Zero will never be my President, never!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

I’ve never heard, until the past few days with this lame-o the term “General So and So” for the Soliciter General. Unreal.

And you think Kagan, of all people, would be skilled at “oral presentations”

Boy, her, Ginsberg and the “wide Latina” Call them the “Lee Sisters”

Home-Lee
Ug-Lee
and Ghast-Lee

Bring in Michelle as the fourth one “UnGod-Lee”


17 posted on 05/11/2010 8:27:24 AM PDT by Mac from Cleveland ("See what you made me do?" Major Malik Hasan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

“muffed her argument”

Ha ha.


22 posted on 05/11/2010 8:30:45 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
She reminds me of Kathy Bates, only not as pretty.


26 posted on 05/11/2010 8:32:18 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Pro Aris et Focis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

She is not qualified I tell you!!!


36 posted on 05/11/2010 8:51:22 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
Oral Argument In Supreme Court Appearance At Citizens United Lawsuit

You mean she muffed it?

37 posted on 05/11/2010 8:52:34 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican on the judiciary panel, said in a statement yesterday that Kagan has a “strong academic background” and that he has been “generally pleased with her job performance as solicitor general,” particularly on terrorism issues.

http://preview.bloomberg.com/news/2010-05-10/republicans-will-review-brief-litigation-experience-of-court-pick-kagan.html

Gomer Pyle Speaks


38 posted on 05/11/2010 8:53:34 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Afterwards, she was called on the carpet.


39 posted on 05/11/2010 8:53:59 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Is this payback for losing in the courts?


41 posted on 05/11/2010 8:55:50 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

43 posted on 05/11/2010 8:56:16 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice
44 posted on 05/11/2010 8:57:01 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr

Obama so far is batting a thousand. Neither candidate is qualified to be near the Supreme Court; just as he isn’t.

This what you get when you elect bottom of the barrel scum buckets.


45 posted on 05/11/2010 8:58:36 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson