Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

Flip that over for me. Why send the different one to Hawai’i?


92 posted on 05/11/2010 6:38:45 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Lee'sGhost
Flip that over for me. Why send the different one to Hawai’i?

FWIU, the wording for the Hawaiian one was specifically required by Hawaiian law.

94 posted on 05/11/2010 6:41:48 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lee'sGhost

Because Hawaii requires a separate statement certifying that the candidate is Constitutionally eligible, rather than simply assuming that the DNC and RNC will follow their own constitutions. Normally the Hawaii Democratic Party certified the Constitutional eligibility in the same document saying that the candidate was the HDP’s duly chosen candidate, which was hand-delivered to the Elections Office about a month after the democratic convention. For Obama, the HDP did everything totally different. They signed their statement the day before Pelosi signed the DNC certifications; the HDP left off the Constitutional eligibility language, signaling the DNC that if Obama was going to get on the Hawaii ballot they would have to be the ones to certify his eligibility because the HDP refused.

The HDP representative I spoke with on the phone refused to say who authorized the change, when, or why. He had some choice words about “birthers” though. lol.


97 posted on 05/11/2010 6:56:08 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lee'sGhost

Because hawaii allows self-sworn certification. It does not check.

(6) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by the

9 candidate that the candidate qualifies under the law

10 for the office the candidate is seeking and that the

11 candidate has determined that, except for the

12 information provided by the registered voters signing

13 the nomination papers, all of the information on the

14 nomination papers is true and correct;

15 (7) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by a

16 party candidate that the candidate is a member of the

17 party;

18 (8) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath, where

19 applicable, by the candidate, that the candidate has

20 complied with the provisions of article II, section 7,

21 of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii;

22 (9) A sworn certification by self-subscribing oath by the

23 candidate that the candidate is in compliance with

Page 6
S.B. NO. 980

1 section 831-2, dealing with felons, and is eligible to

2 run for office; and

3 (10) The name the candidate wishes printed on the ballot and

4 the mailing address of the candidate.”


103 posted on 05/11/2010 8:04:45 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson