Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pellegrino
Both Obama and the ACLU praised Justice Stevens by saying that he “upheld the rule of law.” Neither one ever said that he “upheld the Constitution.” That makes all the difference.

The liberals consider the Constitution an impediment to what they want to go with our government. Their idea of “rule of law” is judges who view the Constitution as a ball of Silly Putty, to be changed at their whim. That's why they avoid referring to the Constitution.

There is a danger that the people might read that document. find out that it was meant from the beginning to LIMIT the powers of government, and take it seriously. Now, we can't have that happen, now can we?

And that is why the liberals have to pretend that they don't know what the Tea Party people want. Under no circumstances can the other side recognize the respect for the Constitution which is a bedrock of the Party people.

John / Billybob

4 posted on 05/09/2010 4:45:07 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.TheseAretheTimes.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

The Constitution put into practice the government’s only duty as expressed in the Declaration, to secure our unalienable rights.

Try as liberals will, our Natural Law based Constitution cannot be legitimately turned into an instrument of Social Justice.


5 posted on 05/09/2010 5:40:20 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson