Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Of course the 1899 part is a typo but it shows how nerous the people who keep these records get around them.
1 posted on 05/08/2010 7:07:50 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: jmaroneps37
...but it shows how nerous the people who keep these records get around them.

Did you mean to say "onerous" or "nervous".

Personally, either one would work.

2 posted on 05/08/2010 7:12:10 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Vampires! Have you seen them near any mirrors?


3 posted on 05/08/2010 7:12:51 AM PDT by griswold3 (Immigration solution: Tall Fences, Wide Gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

It would be interesting to see if there was a lawyer by the name of Michelle Obama in 1899. Could it be the current one used the others data?


4 posted on 05/08/2010 7:14:32 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Linky no worky....conspiracy theory?


5 posted on 05/08/2010 7:15:03 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Link to the Collins Report doesn’t work.


6 posted on 05/08/2010 7:15:33 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

The inventory control system at my company defaults to 1899 when it hits too many bogus entries.


7 posted on 05/08/2010 7:16:36 AM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Just how stupid do these people think we are?

The accompanying dialogue suggests this failure to list a second name could well be the reason he relinquished his law license in 1993.

What is hard to fathom is why Obama, the President of the Harvard Law Review, just gave up his law license at age 47

Well, was he 47 in 1993? Or is "relinquished" different than "just gave up"? I'm close to saying that "these people" measured this author pretty well.

9 posted on 05/08/2010 7:19:31 AM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

“Curiously that position has not been filled since her departure.”

I believe no one yet has qualified. From what I can infer, you have to: a) be the spouse of an Illinois state senator; b) said senator must be willing to engage in corrupt practices; c) being black is a very useful, though not necessary, qualification, etc.


10 posted on 05/08/2010 7:20:42 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

“Snopes fact check site”

I choked on my coffee at that oxymoron. Snopes is run by democrat pary activists who CONSTANTLY distort, cover-up, and lie.


12 posted on 05/08/2010 7:21:13 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember ("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

More unbelievable coverup for the biggest swindle in US history...none of this swindling would be possible without the media handmaiden, running out front, at the flank, on the rear, in exhaustive, preemptive and catch-up damage control and smokecloud creation.

The criminal media are all accessories to this.

Obama was the sweet spot moment the progressves have waited for to destroy this republic. He HAD to be black. That is their ACE, their screen of invincibility.

They already planned a “how dare you question the black man??!!” strategy and already planned to hammer away at any criticism or quest to look into his background as racist.

They knew with the bootlick fools in the media, they could cut the legs out of a sizable of critics with this inflammatory accusation—the substance, the questions would be pushed underground and buried in the rigtheous indignation of the ‘morally outraged’ left.

They knew how this would play.

The only toughie is the fact, although he gives good teleprompter, Obama is so layered up in scandal and checkered issues of legitmacy and hidden creds.

His operatives must be stressed and stretched as tight as a drum trying to stay up on this tangled web of deception 24/7.


13 posted on 05/08/2010 7:22:36 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

In 1993...at age 47?


14 posted on 05/08/2010 7:23:14 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

15 posted on 05/08/2010 7:23:43 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

We are being lied too every day and the lies just don’t hold water.


16 posted on 05/08/2010 7:25:11 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Thank You God for Freeing the Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Where is Kitty Kelley when you need her?!


17 posted on 05/08/2010 7:29:36 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=66235B7DDFED538C


18 posted on 05/08/2010 7:30:03 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Bump.


22 posted on 05/08/2010 7:49:05 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Pro Aris et Focis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
FYI, there is no such thing as a “law license” since most States issue “P” numbers or “permits” to practice law in their respective States. In order for a State to issue a “law license” the Governor of the State would have to issue it, that would be a conflict of interest and the Governor could not legally do that.

If you doubt, ask a lawyer you know to produce his or her law license and see what they show you? A permit is not a license, in fact a lawyer stands before a court by permission, where an American stands before a court by “Right.”

Please check it out for kicks and giggles, it will rock your world to learn the truth. This is just one lie taught to the American people over the many years the statis and progressives have taken control of our Nation.

23 posted on 05/08/2010 7:51:28 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (We are kicking Ass in Afghanistan, soon we will be home to kick some more Asses in Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

The aka should have shown up long before he got his license during the background check. I can’t comment on how thorough the check is in IL, but there is one.

The aka wouldn’t necessarily have prevented him from getting licensed as long as it was explainable & not an intent to defraud.

Whatever crazy stuff showed up on his license app, the state bar has broad discretion to approve or deny.

In that day & age, I suspect the IL bar would have been reluctant to deny admission to any minority applicant.


25 posted on 05/08/2010 7:51:39 AM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

bump


36 posted on 05/08/2010 8:17:24 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

They know Americans are stupid. That was confirmed in November, 2008.


37 posted on 05/08/2010 8:19:50 AM PDT by Fresh Wind ("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson