Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right

If it wasn’t a forgery then why didn’t it note the amendment that the HDOH has indicated was made in 2006 - since state law and DOH rules say that the amendment is required to be noted on any genuine long-form or COLB?

Why was it given a number 3 days later than the Nordyke twins’ but the number is later than theirs? Okubo has ruled out the explanations of pre-numbered certificates at the hospitals and a 3-day processing wait for different piles of BC’s at the state registrar’s office. Since those explanations are ruled out, what is your explanation?


9 posted on 05/07/2010 9:16:18 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

The fact is there is no reason for a forgery. The state of Hawaii recognizes Obama as being born there. They would issue a COLB which shows that. Whether the document that was floated around is legitimate doesn’t matter. All that matters is what his original birth certificate shows. If I had to bet, I would bet it shows it was turned in by his grandma on August 4, 1961. It showed up in the papers, so something was turned in.


15 posted on 05/07/2010 9:23:55 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson