Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right

It is a FACT that in the early 60’s all you needed was a relative to say you were born there and that was good enough, all you had to say was that you had a home birth!


69 posted on 05/08/2010 3:58:27 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: panthermom

I believe, given all the information I have, that there was one medical item that was required on the Hawaii BC’s that Madelyn Dunham forgot to bring with her when she reported the birth to the local registrar. The normal way they verified that item was by having the baby examined by a Hawaii doctor, who then completed the BC.

Obama’s BC wasn’t completed until he added that item in 2006. His BC and COLB both have note of that amendment, and if people saw it they would immediately realize there was a serious problem with the claim of a Hawaii birth, since Obama was never seen by a Hawaii doctor in the first 30 days after birth. That’s why he has to hide all this stuff. The best Hawaii has for him is an amended late BC which doesn’t count as prima facie evidence and which actually shows that the claim of a Hawaii birth is very, very unlikely to be true.


87 posted on 05/08/2010 8:22:23 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson