I believe, given all the information I have, that there was one medical item that was required on the Hawaii BC’s that Madelyn Dunham forgot to bring with her when she reported the birth to the local registrar. The normal way they verified that item was by having the baby examined by a Hawaii doctor, who then completed the BC.
Obama’s BC wasn’t completed until he added that item in 2006. His BC and COLB both have note of that amendment, and if people saw it they would immediately realize there was a serious problem with the claim of a Hawaii birth, since Obama was never seen by a Hawaii doctor in the first 30 days after birth. That’s why he has to hide all this stuff. The best Hawaii has for him is an amended late BC which doesn’t count as prima facie evidence and which actually shows that the claim of a Hawaii birth is very, very unlikely to be true.
The best Hawaii has for him is an amended late BC which doesnt count as prima facie evidence and which actually shows that the claim of a Hawaii birth is very, very unlikely to be true.
Just out of curiosity, how does one supply a doctor's examine of a newborn baby for birth certificate purposes 45 years late?
Except the statement at the bottom of his CoLB says that it is prima facie evidence.