Therefore you seem to be asserting that the FactCheck online COLB image is in fact “his” (presumably meaning “Obama’s”) COLB. Are you not making a logical leap of faith here? Where and when did Obama swear on penalty of perjury (in which jurisdiction) that the FactCheck COLB image is an authentic COLB? If you are claiming that a digitized image published on the internet can not be analyzed to determine whether or not the original, hard copy is a forgery, then it seems as if it should follow that a digitized image published on the internet can not be analyzed to determine whether or not the original, hard copy is authentic, either. An image is just that, an image. It seems to me that this is the reason why, when stopped for a traffic violation, most of us can’t get away with “just kindly look at my driver’s license on the internet, officer, for prima facie evidence of my identity and my license to drive an auto.”
Do you really think that any court of law would use the factcheck.org image of Obama’s COLB as opposed to getting a copy of the ORIGINAL COLB directly from the state of Hawaii since that state has already verified that Obama was born there?
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”—July 27, 2009
If any court of law ever wants to see Obama’s birth doucments for themselves, Obama will give his permission for the state of Hawaii to forward a copy to that Court along with a sworn and notarized statement from Dr. Fukino, Director of the State Health Department.
Pelosi also could have seen a copy of the real thing, but you know what? The HDOH has confirmed that she never even asked to see it.
She swore an oath that he is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS without even checking his age and citizenship status.
Should a court be concerned that Pelosi perjured herself? Why or why not? Should the fact that Pelosi perjured herself have some bearing on whether Obama was ever legally certified as POTUS - since it was based on a lie?