Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Urges Catholic Church to Play 'Major Role' in Immigration Overhaul
Fox News ^ | MAy 7,2010 | Fox News

Posted on 05/07/2010 7:09:29 PM PDT by NoLibZone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: narses; wagglebee

It looks like the Catholic Church has bigger problems on its hands than Protestants.

I would hazard a guess that this is what they get for not standing up to her over abortion at the very least.


41 posted on 05/11/2010 12:23:18 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

This is just Pelosi trying to remain relevant, she knows her days in power will soon be at an end.


42 posted on 05/11/2010 12:26:16 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Arthur Wildfire! March; betty boop; WKB; greyfoxx39

Where’s separation of church and state when you need it?


43 posted on 05/11/2010 12:41:17 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Arthur Wildfire! March; betty boop; WKB; greyfoxx39

This is typical liberal mentality.

They think that if they invoke God, the Christians will just roll over and expose their jugular.

It’s like they think that Christians believe everything that someone tells them in the name of God and are so afraid of being seen to be opposed to God that they just fall in step and comply. *She said that this is what God wants us to do. Oh no! We can’t argue now.*

Earth to Pelosi and liberals......

Use (God) at your own risk.


44 posted on 05/11/2010 12:44:57 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Heck, she’s using GOD to advance her own agenda.


45 posted on 05/11/2010 12:45:34 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

So much for the old “separation of church and state”.. she should know people do not listen to the church..after all she is a pro abort


46 posted on 05/11/2010 1:27:13 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; metmom; RnMomof7; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; HarleyD; wmfights; Forest Keeper; ...

If this had happened in a Protestant church, the feds would be looking into revoking its tax-exempt status.


47 posted on 05/11/2010 5:30:09 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

I don’t know why the Vatican doesn’t publicly excommunicate these people. You either have beliefs and convictions or you don’t. Stop being wishy-washy about everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excommunication#The_Catholic_Church
According to the Catholic Church, excommunication, in the sense of a formal proceeding, is not a penalty, but rather a formal proclamation of a pre-existing condition in a more or less prominent member of the Catholic Church. When such a person commits acts that in themselves separate him from the communion of the faithful, particularly when by word, deed, or example he or she “spreads division and confusion among the Faithful”, it is necessary for the Church to clarify the situation by means of a formal announcement, which informs the laity that this is not a person to follow, and notifies the clergy that the person, by their own willful acts, has separated from the Church and is no longer to receive the sacraments, with the exception of Reconciliation if they turn from their ways. The decree may also indicate the mode of Reconciliation required for re-entry into the Church, specifying whether the local bishop may administer the process or it is reserved to the Pope. Excommunication is never a merely “vindictive penalty” (designed solely to punish), but is always used as a “medicinal penalty” intended to pressure the person into changing their behaviour or statements, repent and return to full communion.


48 posted on 05/11/2010 5:34:30 PM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

You know, we ex-Catholics keep getting shredded by FRoman Catholics for our relating what we know what grassroots Catholics believe.

We are constantly being told that it is not accurate, that that’s not what the Catholic Church teaches, etc.

But look at a situation like this. And look at all the Catholics that vote Democratic during elections and put the likes of obama, Kennedy, Kerry, in positions of power.

All that does is go to show that we are correct about what the average grassroots Catholic believes and that the Church, by its silence and inaction, is giving tacit agreement to it.

There’s a big difference between what FRoman Catholics would like the Church to teach, how they would like the Church to function, and what they wish it would be,... and what it really is.

This shows what it is in practice. Right or not, it’s reality.


49 posted on 05/11/2010 5:44:52 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; RnMomof7; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; wmfights; Forest Keeper
If this had happened in a Protestant church, the feds would be looking into revoking its tax-exempt status.

Only where a Republican speaks. The "Rev" Jackson and Sharpton seem not to have a problem inviting Clinton or Obama to speak. Yet Palin's church can be firebombed and no one says a word.

Personally, the Democrats are the ones trying to take away religious freedoms. They are for homosexual activities, abortions, etc. Why a church think they should hear them speak is beyond me. For the Catholics to invite Pelosi to speak is like the early Christians wanting to hear Nero points of views.

50 posted on 05/11/2010 6:14:11 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

chutzpah, industrial strength.


51 posted on 05/11/2010 6:28:20 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Hypocracy.


52 posted on 05/12/2010 2:22:16 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (We knew deep down it was this bad. Devour ugly truths with glee -- truth is our weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; RnMomof7; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; wmfights; ...
For the Catholics to invite Pelosi to speak is like the early Christians wanting to hear Nero points of views.

This church embraces liberalism at every opportunity. Why FR RC's keep trying to sell the nonsense that it is a conservative church is beyond me. RC's were one of the key voting blocs that put 0bama in office and gave the radical left a huge majority. Outside of the lip service they give to life issues and marriage they walk hand in hand with the radical left.

Destroying America by supporting massive immigration of under educated, non english speaking people is anything but conservative.

53 posted on 05/12/2010 8:32:36 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

That about sums it up....

RCC voting history is there for all to see.


54 posted on 05/12/2010 9:15:47 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; RnMomof7; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Quix
****Outside of the lip service they give to life issues and marriage they walk hand in hand with the radical left.****

But if you post an article bringing that to light you are belittled and the premise of said article is downplayed.

55 posted on 05/12/2010 11:46:42 AM PDT by Gamecock (If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; RnMomof7; Alex Murphy; Quix
But if you post an article bringing that to light you are belittled and the premise of said article is downplayed.

It is the strangest thing to see. No matter how bad their church is on something they will defend it. All the recent discussions about the Marian cult and the worship of Mary and they keep defending it. Lord help them.

The immigration issue is just one more example of why they can not be depended on as an ally.

56 posted on 05/12/2010 12:39:13 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; Alex Murphy; Gamecock
This church embraces liberalism at every opportunity. Why FR RC's keep trying to sell the nonsense that it is a conservative church is beyond me. RC's were one of the key voting blocs that put 0bama in office and gave the radical left a huge majority. Outside of the lip service they give to life issues and marriage they walk hand in hand with the radical left.

In general I agree the RC leadership is left..the pope would like a disarmed socialist world with one religion (guess which one :)

I suspect most of the bishops and cardinals would be in agreement with the "father" in Rome..

But I think that the whole legalize the mexicans is because they are by and large catholics and they will fill the western churches ...it is self interest.

I will say that the FR catholics are generally politically conservative.. I have no idea how they feel about this push by their church

57 posted on 05/12/2010 12:54:23 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; NoLibZone; metmom; Alex Murphy; Gamecock
But I think that the whole legalize the mexicans is because they are by and large catholics and they will fill the western churches ...it is self interest.

I agree, it is self serving.

I will say that the FR catholics are generally politically conservative.. I have no idea how they feel about this push by their church

I'm not so sure. They are very quick to proclaim their church is conservative. If they can't recognize how leftist it is how conservative can they be. With their offerings they support a liberal church that is undermining this country.

58 posted on 05/12/2010 1:02:15 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; RnMomof7; HarleyD; NoLibZone; metmom; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; 1000 silverlings; ...
They are very quick to proclaim their church is conservative. If they can't recognize how leftist it is how conservative can they be. With their offerings they support a liberal church that is undermining this country.

I agree.

RCs here give lip service to conservative principles, but when push comes to shove, they fall into lockstep behind Roman Catholic social justice theory, which is pure socialism bordering on communism, and most recently articulated by Ratzinger's "global authority" encyclical.

Truly, the RCC is an enemy to religious, political and individual liberty.

I just never knew to what extent until I started reading these threads and learning what RCs actually believe. RCs elected Obama. They are not conservative. Period.

59 posted on 05/12/2010 2:48:33 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; wmfights; HarleyD; NoLibZone; metmom; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; 1000 silverlings; ...
I will say that the FR catholics are generally politically conservative.. I have no idea how they feel about this push by their church

I would encourage anyone to spend a few dollars and buy Ratzinger's roughly 60-page "global authority" encyclical which was cheered and bravo-ed by every Roman Catholic on this site.

The encyclical is pure communism. It's even more extreme than it's been portrayed. Once you read it, and once you realize NO ROMAN CATHOLIC ON THIS SITE criticized its dangerous, anti-American vision for the future, I doubt you'd believe this again.

60 posted on 05/12/2010 2:57:14 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson