Posted on 05/06/2010 12:29:51 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA
You come off defensive and abrasive from the very beginning.
I agree. In which case, what's the point? Just to exchange Babs with a (D) for Carly with an (R) next to her name? Thanks, but no thanks.
Chuck Devore seems like a good guy, but Campbell is the one who really has the best shot at beating Boxer.
I am voting for Campbell.
McCain, Paul and now Fiorina...that Palin is sure a conservative! LOL...piker.
> Who gives a flying flip. Anybody but Boxer
Arrrrrg!! It’s folks like you that make it possible for Dimocraps in GOP clothing to win over qualified conservative candidates. Shame on you.
And I am sure Ron Paul will appreciate yours.
May 6th, 2010
Campbell campaign statement on Sarah Palin endorsing Carly Fiorina
Sarah Palin’s endorsement of Fiorina now settles the IOU from the 2008 election cycle. California voters are not buying that a failed CEO can be an effective U.S. Senator. Voters are looking for a Republican with a balance of experience, a real record fighting wasteful federal spending and the ability to defeat Barbara Boxer and poll after poll says that Republican is Tom Campbell.
Isn't she coming off hair loss from chemo?
Yep, when someone denigrates my state out of ignorance, I’m going to be up front with my opinion about it.
I think I’ll sit on this one for a while.
Ron Paul is a bigger idiot than Palin.
“Yep, when someone denigrates my state out of ignorance”
Ignorance? Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer and Arnold f’ing Schwarzennegar(sp?)
Combined with the ilk that makes up your state reps and frankly I do not see how one could possibly come to a different conclusion than I have. I have read your excuses and frankly I reject them. Your state is blue because the majority of the voters in your state are blue.
Same with mine, same with Wisconsin, New York etc. etc.
“please narrow down your list to those that have endorsed two RINOs in the primaries.”
I’ll add one more criteria - those who’ve endorsed two RINOs in the primaries since the Tea Party movement (post MAObama election.) Remaining from your list:
**Newt endorsed Scozzafava
**Fred Thompson endorsed McCain for Senate 2010
**Sarah Palin endorsed McCain for Senate 2010 and Fiorina for Senate 2010.
I don’t think too many of us are worrying about Newt and Fred Thompson, the way we’re concerned about Palin’s endorsements - as she is a current power in the Conservative movement and those other two are not really that.
Like I said...anybody but Boxer
DeVore? Who’s he?
Shame on me for wanting to defeat Boxer.
Gotta link to those stats?
DeVore must not be working NorCal
Whether one endorsed a RINO in a primary since the Tea Party movement or before the Tea party movement, doesn't make a difference to me.
Both cases would be wrong.
For example DeMint endorsed both Mitt and Goober Graham in their primaries. Both were bad endorsements.
Reject anything you like. If you’re too stupid to listen to someone who has on the ground experience in-state, then you’ve just disqualified yourself as a person who really wants to gain an understanding of what takes place here and why.
You are still in denial that the Republican Party has essentially written off California. Until 2001, California had a Republican Governor. Wilson wasn’t an on-fire Conservative, but at least he was decent fiscally.
He is also the reason why we have Schwarzenegger today. All the stops were pulled out to put that RINO in office. And those stops were pulled out by TOP REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP in California, Wilson primary among them. And now they’re pushing for Meg Whitman.
No such effort has been lofted for other candidates who were solid Conservatives. So when you trash the citizens of California for not electing Conservatives, just be aware that you have to ignore why that is true to display this level of ignorance.
Californians who are presented with a clear explanation will vote the right way. In 2008, they denied legalization of homosexual marriage rights in California. Why did that happen, in a state that you deem to be full of liberals? You can’t have it both ways ace. Either the Citizens of California are mostly leftists, or they simply haven’t been given clear choices.
Here. Explain this.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2008_general/maps/returns/props/prop-8.htm
Who do you like and can win?
Got back to Alaska, Sarah.
But let me ask you this: are we supposed to choose whoever Tea Party affiliates pick? Didn't the Tea Party endorse Scott Brown? I know many complain of drinking the koolaid, but are we all supposed to drink the Tea Party koolaid too? I thought individual choice was still what makes conservatives principled? If McCain is so terrible (and he is), why hasn't the Tea Party endorsed Hayworth?
If you're looking for a perfect movement, the Tea Party isn't it.
Now, as for your criteria, seems to me you keep adding conditions. RINOs shouldn't be endorsed EVER. Doesn't matter whether its primary or election. Sarah was wrong for this and for McCain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.