Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United and Continental Said to Agree to Merge
NY Times ^ | May 2, 2010 | MICHAEL J. de la MERCED and JAD MOUAWAD

Posted on 05/02/2010 3:06:08 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper

United Airlines and Continental Airlines agreed Sunday to a $3 billion merger that will create the world’s biggest airline, people familiar with the discussions said.

The boards of both companies approved the all-stock transaction, these people said. A deal is expected to be announced on Monday. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter.

The combined company will keep the United name and will be based in Chicago. It will be run by Continental’s top executive, Jeffery A. Smisek. United’s chairman, Glenn F. Tilton, will be nonexecutive chairman for two years. After that, Mr. Smisek will become the executive chairman.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airlines; continental; ual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 05/02/2010 3:06:08 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Excellent strategic move. Too big to fail now.
2 posted on 05/02/2010 3:07:19 PM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

What willl the new airline be called? Unitental, or Continited? ;-D


3 posted on 05/02/2010 3:07:55 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Bad news for Airbus, since Continental only uses Boeing.


4 posted on 05/02/2010 3:08:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2312894/posts?page=242)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

For 30 to 50 percent of the Continental work force, I wonder what they plan on doing once their airline careers are over.


5 posted on 05/02/2010 3:09:02 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Too big to fail, less competition and higher fares.


6 posted on 05/02/2010 3:11:23 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bad news for Airbus, since Continental only uses Boeing.

They'll have over 150 Airbus in their inventory, with another 75 on order or on options.

7 posted on 05/02/2010 3:11:57 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

What a shame. Continental was a great airline, and United sucks. Continental will cease to be and we’ll just be left with a really big, craptacular United Air Lines. Bad news for the consumer. Just when I thought commercial air travel couldn’t possibly get any worse...


8 posted on 05/02/2010 3:13:59 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

The new airline will still have the name “United.”

The Continental name will disappear.


9 posted on 05/02/2010 3:14:58 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm voting for Sarah Palin because she pisses off the right people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

How about Uncontinental?


10 posted on 05/02/2010 3:15:22 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
You Know The Drill
Click the Pic

Click The Pic Hey! FReepers!
Help Fill The Tank!
How About It? Huh?
It Ain't Askin' Too Much
Ya Know....


11 posted on 05/02/2010 3:22:48 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR.......Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Picture of the airlines merging ...

Photobucket

12 posted on 05/02/2010 3:23:14 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Those That Turn Their Swords into Plows Will Plow For Those That Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

CAL’s good management team to run company, but how do you change the attitudes of the UAL employees who hate everyone? Such a shame.


13 posted on 05/02/2010 3:32:18 PM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
What willl the new airline be called? Unitental, or Continited? ;-D

Incontinent Airlines

14 posted on 05/02/2010 3:37:44 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

And so goes Continential’s Cleveland hub....

Obama’s fault......


15 posted on 05/02/2010 3:46:48 PM PDT by cleveland gop (2010 NBA PLAYOFFS--NEXT VICTIM THE CELTICS!!! 5 DOWN 11 TO GO! GO CAVS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
The combined company will keep the United name and will be based in Chicago.

Is this just a coincidence? I wonder.

If the Cap and Trade bill passes, the resulting carbon credits will be traded--in Chicago.

If the government economic "regulation" bill passes, it will shift a huge amount of trading in derivatives from New York--to Chicago.

Looks to me like yet another Chicago way power grab. This merger doesn't pass the anti-trust smell test. But it goes through under the Dems. Similarly, the Dems who constantly screamed about "big oil" permitted the merger of Exxon and Mobil, by bill clinton. Teddy Roosevelt would have rolled over in his grave.

The last thing we need is more megacorporations, and less competition. Airline fares will predicatably go up as a result of this.

16 posted on 05/02/2010 3:51:02 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
They'll have over 150 Airbus in their inventory, with another 75 on order or on options.

Management will be mostly from Continental, so there might be a pro-Boeing bias. However, if the continuous delays of the A380 and the 787 (aka 7-late-7) have proven anything, it's that at the present day and age it makes sense not to rely on a single supplier. That's also why Lufthansa went for the 747-8i when they could've bought just more A380s, while BA for the first time ordered Airbus A380s instead of 747s.

A fleet consisting of 787s and A350s is actually quite a good fit, as the larger A350 variants compete with the older, less efficient 777 rather than the smaller 787. So IMHO prematurely cancelling the A350 orders wouldn't be such a smart move.
17 posted on 05/02/2010 4:28:08 PM PDT by wolf78 (Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
LOL!!!
18 posted on 05/02/2010 4:54:19 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Here's a thought!! Donate to the website you are on RIGHT NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wolf78

A350 is going to be a great plane, can’t wait to see it.


19 posted on 05/02/2010 4:57:55 PM PDT by Pulpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

My thoughts exactly when American bought out TWA.


20 posted on 05/02/2010 5:13:23 PM PDT by peggybac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson