Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Even though 1.21 million abortions were performed in 2005, this was not enough for Thorne-Thomsen. She wrote, “On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low.”

Too low? That's a murdered baby EVERY 24 SECONDS you heartless bitch.

1 posted on 04/30/2010 4:18:19 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 04/30/2010 4:18:47 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Obamacare will dramatically increase the number of abortions.


3 posted on 04/30/2010 4:19:07 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 04/30/2010 4:19:20 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

They should lead by example and commit suicide. Heck, if they want unlimited abortions, then having them far removed from birth should be just fine.


5 posted on 04/30/2010 4:23:32 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
She never explained how many abortions a year would be enough for the Pro-Choice Public Education Project, but continued to write, “We say we care about women and want them to have access to all the information, services and resources necessary to make the best decisions they can for themselves and their families. That is at the core of reproductive justice. Not reducing the number of abortions.”

Likely when there are NO live births, she'll consider the number just about right.

I feel sick.

God's going to have to forgive me for wishing that she'd feel the pain for eternity that every baby who was ever aborted was forced to endure.

6 posted on 04/30/2010 4:24:24 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

“On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low.”

So do them for free. Provide a free ride too..


8 posted on 04/30/2010 4:25:51 PM PDT by mainsail that
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I’m betting that they’re thinking of all the criminals that won’t be born. :wink: :wink:


10 posted on 04/30/2010 4:30:50 PM PDT by chesley (Lib arguments are neither factual, logical, rational, nor reasonable. They are, however, creative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Sheeesh. Frickin grim reaper. What a thing to be disappointed about.


12 posted on 04/30/2010 4:36:15 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
“We say we care about women and want them to have access to all the information, services and resources necessary to make the best decisions they can for themselves and their families. That is at the core of reproductive justice. Not reducing the number of abortions.”

What a sick, twisted, bitter woman Thorne_Thomsen is.

13 posted on 04/30/2010 4:36:17 PM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Many in the pro-choice movement are for popualtion control. Marget Sanger created Planned Parenthood for that reason. At least some groups see abortion for what it is. It is genocide against the poor, handicappe and minorities.


14 posted on 04/30/2010 4:36:48 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

15 posted on 04/30/2010 4:52:02 PM PDT by GloriaJane (Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Can’t credit liberals for very many smart analogies. I’d love to see them try to sell that tired old feminist liberation garbage today.


16 posted on 04/30/2010 5:06:49 PM PDT by Maelstorm (They'll take the money you earn, take the minds of your children, and take your right to disagree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The author makes reference to abortion being like setting a fireman on fire before rushing into a building, a soldier being shot before being issued a firearm, and a man having to view his vans deferens before getting a vasectomy.

This is a ridiculous analogy and completely wrong. It would be more fair to compare a fireman watching his child be set on fire, or his child being shot. It has always been a puzzlement to me when pro aborts go nuts about the ultrasound thing. If a woman wants an abortion, an ultrasound will NOT change her mind, UNLESS she had been convinced by someone that the baby she is carrying is a clump of cells, not a life. Abortions will NOT be reduced by this law unless most women don’t know they are carrying a baby in the first place, IMHO, and therefore, ultrasounds won’t deter them from their choice. That said, if they have been lied to about development of a baby in the womb, and this window in shows that, then there will be a dramatic drop in the number of abortions because of this law. Just what exactly are the pro aborts worried about? Perhaps misleading those women coming in to PP about abortion? Seems silly to me to be so off their rockers. They are the ones who always talk about learning, education, enlightenment, and all that. You would think educating a woman about this stuff would be a natural for those who consider themselves so progressive and enlightened, no?


18 posted on 04/30/2010 7:15:58 PM PDT by wombtotomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; Allegra; cpforlife.org; Salamander; Markos33
"She never explained how many abortions a year would be enough for the Pro-Choice Public Education Project..."

There will never be enough. Moloch is a hungry god.


21 posted on 04/30/2010 8:12:21 PM PDT by shibumi (Pablo (the Wily One) signed up for the "Hippo Attack" ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Showing a man seeking a vasectomy his own vas deferens by sticking a camera in through his urethra.

Might be a good idea.

24 posted on 05/01/2010 12:11:58 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Abortion is genocide and Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics should be put out of business!


25 posted on 05/01/2010 4:02:04 AM PDT by proudofthesouth (We need a group of men with the intelligence, courage, & integrity that our Founding Fathers had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson