Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Preps for Tea Party 'Terrorists'
The Patriot Post ^ | April 29, 2010 | Mark Alexander

Posted on 04/29/2010 1:26:31 PM PDT by Hypo

Army Preps for Tea Party 'Terrorists' By Mark Alexander · Thursday, April 29, 2010

"The duty imposed upon [the president] to take care, that the laws be faithfully executed, follows out the strong injunctions of his oath of office, that he will 'preserve, protect, and defend the constitution.' The great object of the executive department is to accomplish this purpose; and without it, be the form of government whatever it may, it will be utterly worthless for offence, or defence; for the redress of grievances, or the protection of rights; for the happiness, or good order, or safety of the people." --Justice Joseph Story

A few months back, the commander in chief of our Armed Forces, that erstwhile community organizer Barack Hussein Obama1, denigrated a large cross section of Americans who identify with the Tea Party movement -- those who advocate for Essential Liberty2 and Rule of Law.

Obama identified them as malcontents, "waving their little tea bags."

Since then, the Obama administration and their Leftmedia sycophants3 have endeavored to characterize Tea Party attendees as rude, radical, racist, redneck, enemies of the state. They have attempted to tie high-profile acts of violence against the government to the Tea Party, including the pilot who crashed his plane into a Texas IRS headquarters. (Turns out, he was a Leftwing nut.)

In fact, Americans who attend Tea Party rallies are from all walks of life, as noted in the Patriot Declaration4, Patriots who are peacefully and constitutionally petitioning their government for redress.

As I noted in my tax-day essay5, Tea Parties are "not a call for revolution but for restoration -- a call to undertake whatever measures are dictated by prudence and necessity to restore constitutional Rule of Law."

However, Obama's words do have consequences.

This week, I was contacted by a number of civilian and military personnel (enlisted and officer ranks) who expressed concern about a military exercise proposed for Ft. Knox, the U.S. Bullion Depository. (For the record, I called Ft. Knox security for an official comment and received the standard reply: "We are not authorized to discuss this exercise." The exercise in question may have been one of several proposed security exercise scenarios.)

As with most such exercises, the Ft. Knox scenario outline occurred in stages, as if real time intelligence was being provided at various intervals. The first intel advisory6 was issued on Friday, 23 April 2010, and identifies the terrorist threat adversaries as "Local Militia Groups / Anti-Government Protesters / TEA Party."

You read that right: "TEA Party"!

The alert states that plans for the demonstration may have been interrupted by "Federal and local law enforcement" raids on a "White Supremacists Organization," but "TEA Party organizers have stated that they will protest at the Gold Vault at a future date."

Further, the intel advisory states, "Anti-Government - Health Care Protesters have stated that they would join the TEA Party as a sign of solidarity."

In accordance with the exercise proposal, Ft. Knox post security is placed on high alert because, "these groups are armed, have combative training and some are former Military Snipers. Some may have explosives training / experience," and "a rally at their compound / training area is scheduled."

Another intel update6 was issued on Monday, 26 April 2010, noting that the "rally at the Militia compound occurred," and "Viable threats ... have been made." The intel on the rally notes, "Many members were extremely agitated at what they referred to as Government intervention and over taxation in their lives. Alcohol use 'fanned the flames.' Many military grade firearms were openly carried. An ad hoc 'shoot the government agent' event was held with prizes (alcohol) given for the best shot placement."

The report states further, "Components of bomb making are reported to have been on the site. Some members have criminal records relating to explosive and weapons violations."

In response to the "immediate threat," the exercise stipulates, "local detention centers are being made ready for mass arrests." Both the "QRF I and QRF II" are placed on two hour recall, and the "5-15 CAV" was ordered to "draw weapons from holder and store in most available arms room," and "coordinate with MASA for immediate ammunition draw; have equipment readied for immediate use, i.e. vehicles staged and loaded IAW 5-15 CAV SOP; LMR's charged."

QRF refers to Quick Reaction Force. QRF I is the 16th Cavalry Regiment7. QRF II is the 194th Armored Brigade8.

The 26 April order gives specific instructions for the 5-15 CAV (a 16th Cavalry battalion) to have weapons, ammo, vehicles and communications at ready, and it places the other 2,200 members of the units on two-hour recall. In other words, these orders are to gear up for defending Ft. Knox against Tea Party folks and their co-conspirators who oppose nationalization of our health care sector.

Now, for almost 30 years I have participated in the development and implementation of small and large scale military exercises within the U.S. and around the world.

Such exercises are critical to the readiness of our forces, and the standard for the real time intel reports in these drills requires thinly veiled references to assets of existing or collateral threat vectors such as communist regimes such as China and real terrorist networks such as al-Qa'ida, etc.

Perhaps the writers of such exercises today should focus on response plans for, say, an Islamic terrorist who attacks a post. (See Ft. Hood / Major Nidal Malik Hasan.)

While the Ft. Knox exercise scenario is amateurish in its construct (meaning it was probably composed by a civilian bureaucrat), it still sets an ominous political precedent.

The military officers and enlisted personnel with whom I spoke are all dedicated uniformed Patriots who are loyal, first and foremost, to their oath to "support and defend9" our Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Their concerns about this exercise mirrored my own. As one put it, the exercise "misrepresents freedom loving Americans as drunken, violent racists -- the opponents of Obama's policies have been made the enemy of the U.S. Army."

They were equally concerned that command staff at Ft. Knox had signed off on this exercise, noting, "it has been issued and owned by field grade officers who lead our battalions and brigades," which is to say many Lieutenant Colonels saw this order before it was implemented.

It's not likely that Ft. Knox Commanding General James Milano or Deputy Commander Col. David Teeples, or even the regimental and brigade commanders for the 16th Cav and 194th AB, actually read the exercise scenario, but that doesn't absolve responsibility for such an egregious example of political agendas infiltrating military exercise scenarios.

One officer insisted, "The American people should require greater accountability of their commissioned officers, that they abide by their oath and never allow politically motivated propaganda like this exercise on any post or base again."

Another observed, "Whether this is complacency by officers who do not see such orders as a problem, or worse, officers who recognize the problem but do not insist the orders are changed, this is a serious problem. We are discussing the training of American citizen soldiers in the use of potentially deadly force against a specific group of political dissenters. There is never a time in an officer's career in which he does not have a duty to apply critical thought to the orders he is given and asked to give. It is my opinion that any officer that has allowed these orders to persist, to reach the level of junior officers and soldiers, has demonstrated a lack of judgment or apathy towards what his duty requires of him. Either way, we should demand more of the commissioned officers, who we as a nation empower to lead our sons and daughters into battle."

Indeed, and at best, the blatant malfeasance on the part of the individuals who composed this exercise reflects poorly on the uniformed services.

The antidote to this patent misrepresentation of peaceable Patriots is to expose it with the Light of Truth. As our motto Veritas vos Liberabit affirms, the Truth shall set you Free!

(Note: To report examples of politically motivated "exercises" in either the civilian or military sectors of our federal government, please contact us -- NewsTip@PatriotPost.US)


KEYWORDS: armyofhasan; cwiiping; democrats; donttreadonme; enemydomestic; military; oathkeepers; obama; rapeofliberty; soa; soaincharge; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2010 1:26:31 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hypo

Posse Comitatus violation?

2 posted on 04/29/2010 1:30:13 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hypo

I trust more Americans, especially “conservatives” are waking up to the authoritarian Marxism of Barack Obama and his Marxofascist global friends in low places.

3 posted on 04/29/2010 1:30:18 PM PDT by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM -
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hypo; Eaker; afnamvet; AK2KX; Ancesthntr; An Old Man; ApesForEvolution; aragorn; archy; ...
This is insane.

CW2 Ping

4 posted on 04/29/2010 1:30:55 PM PDT by Travis McGee (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hypo

This is a joke?

5 posted on 04/29/2010 1:31:35 PM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

A violation concerns discussion of the event in court regarding abstract matters of law.
That assumes one is still sucking air, which given the nature of the violation implies some won’t.

6 posted on 04/29/2010 1:33:23 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

Not the first thread today on the subject.

7 posted on 04/29/2010 1:33:50 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hypo

They’ve got to be kidding. I’ve never been to a Tea Party event where little old ladys were a threat to anyone. In fact nobody was a threat to anyone.

Sounds a lot like Germany to me. When our troops see the Tea Party they’ll say “They called us out for this?”

8 posted on 04/29/2010 1:33:57 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I did a search and must have missed them, can you direct me to them. Thanks

9 posted on 04/29/2010 1:36:44 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC2

I cant believe the individual man in the military find this to be acceptable. When will they start to bolt?

10 posted on 04/29/2010 1:37:01 PM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
A violation concerns discussion of the event in court regarding abstract matters of law.

Or a discussion in the House regarding the impeachment of a President.

11 posted on 04/29/2010 1:37:44 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hypo
Search words army+preps
12 posted on 04/29/2010 1:41:18 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

A lot of people don’t really know what’s going on. The military needs to really look into the Tea Party and see that they are people just like them, not some nut group. Then they can start asking questions of their commands as to why they are being called up to stand against their own people.

13 posted on 04/29/2010 1:41:49 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

It’s called ‘conditioning’.

14 posted on 04/29/2010 1:43:02 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet


15 posted on 04/29/2010 1:44:31 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Again, is this real? Did you hear anything about this?

16 posted on 04/29/2010 1:45:18 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hypo

Don’t retreat! Re-load!

17 posted on 04/29/2010 1:49:00 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
When you try to view this link on the Patriot Post webpage, you will see the following message:

Fort Knox Exercise
Editor's Note: The official Fort Knox security exercise documents originally posted on this page were marked "unclassified". However, at the request of command staff at Ft. Knox, we have voluntary removed them for security reasons.

Chilling. Did anyone get a copy of them?

18 posted on 04/29/2010 1:51:30 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hypo
Just keep the cameras handy, and keep it peaceful...

The riot police and the feds will end up looking as foolish as Elloit Ness when he raided that warehouse and cracked open that case of umbrellas, thinking it was hooch.

The libs are wanting something drastic to happen sooooooo bad between now and November. Don't give it to fact, take it away from them in the voting booth.

If anything happened, I don't know which side the armed forces would land on, obeying a marxist government, or harming the America citizens they took an oath to protect. if we look at WACO, it is quite worrisome, isn't it.
19 posted on 04/29/2010 1:51:30 PM PDT by FrankR (Standing up against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future will belong to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; humblegunner
This is insane.

This is way past insane!

20 posted on 04/29/2010 1:51:37 PM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson