Skip to comments.
Oklahoma Abortion Bills Become Law
The Oklahoman ^
| April 27, 2010
| Julie Bisbee
Posted on 04/27/2010 11:19:29 AM PDT by gwjack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: RasterMaster
Mine too. I still think Fallin will be the next governor, but Randy is more conservative and closer to my views.
Fallin will be tons better than Henry, tons better.
41
posted on
04/27/2010 6:35:06 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord)
To: matthew fuller; Admin Moderator
Here is the email Lovely Emily sent me:
"From LovelyEmily | 04/27/2010 4:07:27 PM PDT read YOU ARE A HATER WHO WANTS TO TAKE AWAY THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN"
Her acct has been suspended. Thanks, admin mods.
42
posted on
04/27/2010 6:40:04 PM PDT
by
matthew fuller
(#11. Thou shalt not argue with morons.)
To: Fishtalk
A significant portion of women who see the ultrasound, and hear the heartbeat (it sounds like a clothes washer, actually), are less likely to go ahead with the abortion than those who make decisions under the misnomer that their baby is still “just a bunch of cells.”
To: Fishtalk
The ultrasound would probably serve two purposes —
1. When I was pregnant with my first child my AFP (Alpha-Fetal Protein) count was high which could have indicated Spina Bifida. A “level II” Ultrasound (this was in 1991) was then ordered by my doctor to confirm or refute the blood tests. The ultrasound showed that although the values were high, my daughter was developing perfectly fine — we counted her fingers, toes, saw her corneas developing, and her fingernails! It was AMAZING to tell you the truth! Forcing an ultrasound before an abortion could prevent the abortions of those moms who like me have high screening values, but whose babies do NOT have birth defects. (My daughter is totally healthy and just turned 18 last December).
2. Ordering an ultrasound would automatically prove to the mother that her “mass of fetal tissue” is actually a Baby — often with a beating heart already, and clearly human form. I can’t imagine agreeing to an abortion after seeing an ultrasound that disproves the abortion providers lies about it being a “mass of cells”. (Then again even when I got pregnant at 18 1/2 with my daughter I never even CONSIDERED it as an “easy way out”... Praise God I didn’t — hubby and I have now been married for 17 years and have 4 beautiful daughters together...)
44
posted on
04/27/2010 8:08:57 PM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
To: blackpacific
Oh my gosh... That is one of the most amazing and beautiful things I’ve ever seen! The little baby even made me yawn when it did! LOL Thanks so much for posting the link.
45
posted on
04/27/2010 8:28:56 PM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
To: LovelyEmily
Hello & Goodbye TROLL! Glad you were banned before I saw your post.
46
posted on
04/27/2010 8:30:15 PM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
Abortion is Murder.
This law plays games. It's very simple.
"Thou Shalt Not Kill". ("you shall not murder.")
Why can't the libs comprehend this?
To: Fishtalk
And why the mandatory ultrasound? I mean its okay with me but whats behind that concept?Because one of the ways a lot of abortion businesses pressure potential clients into aborting is by lying to them about the nature of the fetus. They tell potential clients that it's nothing but a "blood clot" that doesn't remotely resemble a baby, that the pictures they have seen of actual aborted babies or babies in the womb are forgeries, or other, similar lies.
They fear that if they were honest with their clients, they would lose business.
A law forcing them to show the ultrasounds to the prospective clients forces them to a level of honesty that they currently avoid.
49
posted on
04/28/2010 5:27:08 AM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: savedbygrace
I didn’t realize that. I thought he was doing pretty well. Oh well, we’ll get another conventional R, and we won’t secede.
50
posted on
04/28/2010 5:59:38 AM PDT
by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Fishtalk
Women are LIED to and told that their BABY is a 'mass of cells, no arms, no legs, nothing like that' at whatever point in their pregnancy (by NURSES AND DOCTORS no less!!) If a mother SEES her BABY BEFORE the murder, that gives her the option of NOT going through with the murder. Of course, when a biological dna giver (I refuse to call them 'mothers') is planning on using the murder as birth control, even that won't sway them. But for many women, it will. God knows how many BABIES will be saved because of a simple ultrasound! :*)
Heartbeat and MOVEMENT visible with embryo at 6 weeks on Ultrasound Not great video quality but you can see the embryo moving, and that line across the bottom is measuring the BABY'S heartrate! AT SIX WEEKS. Ultrasounds required before abortions=GOOD THING. That is, if the doctors don't use a doctored machine that shows a picture of NOTHING instead of what is really in the mother's womb! I wouldn't put anything past them at PP!! >:-(
51
posted on
04/28/2010 6:14:42 AM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue" ><>)
To: All
Oh, this video is even better! You can HEAR the heartbeat of a 7 week old BABY in utero!! OUR GOD IS AN AWESOME GOD, AND WE ARE FEARFULLY AND WONDERFULLY MADE! :*)
Embryo HEARTBEAT at 7 wks
Here's another one
"That's just amazing!" Video and audio of 7 wk embryo on ultrasound
If you don't believe, just surf through the ultrasounds posted by thankful parents of their BABIES at this early stage of development! Do you think a mother would STILL kill her baby after hearing his/her heartbeat??? I think many many many women would be appalled at what they are about to do, and STOP. Figure out another way. Of course liberal, godless women who are calloused will kill the CHILD anyway. God will deal with them someday.
52
posted on
04/28/2010 6:24:32 AM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue" ><>)
To: LovelyEmily
No...they are protecting future women, and men.
53
posted on
04/28/2010 10:11:14 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson