Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/22/2010 2:54:33 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Time to pray for a just outcome.


2 posted on 04/22/2010 2:55:18 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

bookmark


4 posted on 04/22/2010 2:58:31 PM PDT by smokingfrog (Free Men will always be armed with the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; Red Steel

Thanks for making us aware of the factual developments.


7 posted on 04/22/2010 3:02:48 PM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

If Obammy really cared about the Lt. Col. and the rest of our troops he would simply release an original Hawaiian, long-form birth certificate with the signature of the the delivering doctor - the same as what other people have who were born in Hawaii in 1960 and what the troops had to provide to get into the military in the first place.

To me this simply means Obama has no true Hawaiian birth certificate.

It’s absolutely unreal that America has come to this. May God protect our nation.


8 posted on 04/22/2010 3:02:49 PM PDT by Lions Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Good luck to LTC Lakin....he is doing something that all should be doing....challenging the legality of Obama in office.

I think some of these charges will be thrown out by the judge....they basically charged him twice for the same thing.

Of course....the Army will back off once Obama has to release the long form BC


9 posted on 04/22/2010 3:04:51 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m still skeptical this will ever see the inside of a courtroom. But if it does they are charging him with disobeying a direct order so the prosecution will have to prove it is a lawful order. That means obumber will have to be proved legit.


10 posted on 04/22/2010 3:07:30 PM PDT by JoSixChip (You think your having a bad day?.....Somewhere out there is a Mr. Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

they are charging him for not obeying the orders of LTC’s and Colonels


11 posted on 04/22/2010 3:10:44 PM PDT by silverleaf (Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Sigh...

This makes me sad.


14 posted on 04/22/2010 3:15:51 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

FYI, Colonel Peter McHugh is the Garrison Walter Reed garrison commander.

Colonel Gordon Roberts is the Medical Brigade Commander, and a Medal Of Honor winner (as an enlisted soldier).

Could not find what Lieutenant Colonel William Judd is.


20 posted on 04/22/2010 3:23:24 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The same laws that apply to this Lt, need apply to the so called Commander in Chief. Military justice must consider the fact that if the so called president is not eligible to serve. Each and every soldier could be in violation of international law. they are performing an act of aggression that could be viewed as terrorism. The person whom is ordering them to shoot is not legally in his place. The Haque could have a field day with the same laws. remember O signed the Interpol agreement, the Haque could come in and take the American soldier and prosecute them in a world court because of the same accord that Obama signed The soldier has no standing because the executive order as signed by Obama has surrendered American Sovereignity to a World Court. Just wait this will come into the forefront soon enough.


29 posted on 04/22/2010 4:10:06 PM PDT by hondact200 ( Lincoln Freed the Enslaved. Obama Enslaves the Free. Obama is Americas Greatest Threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

ping


38 posted on 04/22/2010 4:52:09 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
One notable difference between the officer and enlisted oaths is that the oath taken by officers does not include any provision to obey orders; while enlisted personnel are bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice to obey lawful orders, officers in the service of the United States are bound by this oath to disobey any order that violates the Constitution of the United States.

Text of the Oath:

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

From Wikipedia.

118 posted on 04/22/2010 10:24:14 PM PDT by matthew fuller (#11. Thou shalt not argue with morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

everything is explained here..

Military Law and Precedents, Volume 1

http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=6WNq4qYz_i4C&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=Not+belonging+to+the+judicial+branch+of+government,+it+follows+that+courts-martial+must+pertain+to+the+executive+department%3B+and+they+are+in+fact+simply+instrumentalities+of+the+executive+power,&source=bl&ots=vm0922HaYa&sig=5ZVzXpSyd3PWBYIzZiT8HmdmKV0&hl=tl&ei=AzzIS-3lMom8rAfou8HuCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=natural%20born&f=false


126 posted on 04/22/2010 10:55:49 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

More power to Lt. Col. Lakin.

He has followed his conscience. His cause—seeking to resolve doubt on Obama’s birth certificate and hence Obama’s qualification to be commander in chief—is reasonable and just.

Lt. Col. Lakin’s military record of long-time and distinguished service speaks for itself. Obama has no valid reason not to permit the birth certificate to speak for itself.


148 posted on 04/23/2010 7:01:26 AM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Lt. Col. Lakin is going to come out a winner on this simply for two reasons:

1) He has followed his conscience.

2) The specified court martial charges/procedures may indeed not permit consideration of Obama’s birth certificate.

But this very exclusion will publicly accentuate the unreasonable withholding of this document.

And that is Lt. Col. Lakin’s objective.

151 posted on 04/23/2010 7:44:08 AM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All
You know what would be interesting.

Speculative scenario:

Let’s say the Courts Martial convenes and Lakin’s representation tries to force the eligibility issue. At that point someone (a courier, a State Department flunky, a Perkins & Coie lawyer, whatever. Besides, I don’t know how the court’s rules would allow for this and I’m just speculating) asks to address the court and submit a certified copy of BHO’s BC in a sealed envelope from Hawaii. How the President is disappointed that a decorated officer has been fooled into sacrificing his career over this issue, blah… blah… blah… And might he be allowed to submit the President’s birth certificate for the court’s consideration.

It seem that then Lakin would be dead in the water. And BHO get a club to beat birther’s with of something like: “Look! I gave a certified copy to a court to try and save an officer’s career. And they just moved on to their next talking point and still won’t shut up!”

Now I don’t think this will necessarily happen, but it might be a clever stratagem.

It certainly wouldn’t shut anyone up.

179 posted on 04/23/2010 10:49:12 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Will Lakin be the 21st Century equivalent to John Brown?
444 posted on 04/26/2010 5:50:55 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson