Skip to comments.
Obama: Supreme Court Nominee Should Take Women's Rights Into Account
FoxNews ^
| April 21, 2010
Posted on 04/21/2010 9:38:19 AM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
So only BIASED Nominees will be considered. The Constitution be damned. How in God's Holy Name did we get this Chicago thug?
1
posted on
04/21/2010 9:38:19 AM PDT
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
How in God's Holy Name did we get this Chicago thug? We allowed God to be removed from our schools and government.
2
posted on
04/21/2010 9:39:35 AM PDT
by
airborne
("It's a great day for hockey!" - 'Badger' Bob Johnson (RIP))
To: Steelfish
How ‘bout a justice who is concerned with individual rights, not special rights?
3
posted on
04/21/2010 9:40:45 AM PDT
by
rbosque
(11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
To: Steelfish
“Women’s Rights”
Is this even a flimsy facade anymore?
Just say - “the nominee has to agree that it’s a ‘right’ to kill an unborn baby at any time for any reason, including sheer convenience”
4
posted on
04/21/2010 9:41:05 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Steelfish
What rights don’t women have that men do? No one is making them sit down to pee!
5
posted on
04/21/2010 9:41:09 AM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: Steelfish
Somebody should explain to him that unlike in Kenya, here in the United States only individual have rights, not groups.
6
posted on
04/21/2010 9:41:59 AM PDT
by
mrmeyer
("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
To: Steelfish
I’m concerned about the diversity of the Court that after Stevens there will not be any WASP justices.
7
posted on
04/21/2010 9:42:35 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: Steelfish
This is why I call him Barack Obortion.
8
posted on
04/21/2010 9:43:04 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we now live in a post-Obamapacolyptic world)
To: Steelfish
Wake up folks Obama is not picking anyone,his communist handlers are picking them..#1 Soro’s will be picking your next Supreme Court Nominee..And then the communist Senate and Congress will vote them in..
9
posted on
04/21/2010 9:43:05 AM PDT
by
PLD
To: mrmeyer
The nominee will be very very liberal. It’s only a question of how radical they are. And, we’ll see what minority group this person belongs to. She may be an open lesbian, for example. She may be a member of some other ethnic minority. “He”, if it’s a man, can only be nominated if he’s a member of an ethnic minority. The only way a caucasian man can be nominated is if he is openly homosexual.
Whatever the case, the nominee will probably be historic, the first of some allegedly oppressed minority group on the high court.
To: Steelfish
Each Congressman who does not DEMAND the BC
should be replaced, removed, and indicted.
11
posted on
04/21/2010 9:48:10 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Steelfish
Each Senator who does not DEMAND the BC
should be replaced, removed, and indicted.
12
posted on
04/21/2010 9:48:31 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Steelfish
Each Supreme Court justice who does not DEMAND the BC
should be impeached.
13
posted on
04/21/2010 9:49:01 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Steelfish
In other words, Obama wants to preserve abortion, or MURDER, of innocent life! Perhaps God is allowing our sinful country to go down the tubes, headed up by Satan’s spawn, because of the stupidity of the people He graced with the promised land! His wrath shall continue to pour out unless we repent and change our wicked ways!!!!!!!
14
posted on
04/21/2010 9:49:21 AM PDT
by
Paperdoll
( On the cutting edge)
To: Steelfish
Sounds like Obama code-talk for: “I will nominate a lesbian to the court to get the gays off my back over Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
To: Steelfish
16
posted on
04/21/2010 9:55:42 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2nd. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
To: Steelfish
You never hear the ‘bama saying his appointee’s should know and follow the law. The SCOTUS has become a nine person legislature to whom statutes and precedents are irrelevant (except for Roe v. Wade, of course).
17
posted on
04/21/2010 9:56:50 AM PDT
by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
To: Steelfish
NOTHING BUT AN EMPTY SUIT - I have said it before and I will say it again and keep on saying it, “Nothing but an empty suit”!!!
To: Steelfish
So the 19th amendment to the US Constitution is OK.
To: Steelfish
I am female and I believe this is crap! Your job as a Supreme Court Justice is to follow the damn constitution! Not to follow Obama or Bill or George or Saucy Bearnaise, or your last gay fling!!! Damn!
20
posted on
04/21/2010 9:59:51 AM PDT
by
4everontheRight
("America is good. And if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Tocquevill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson