This doesn't make sense. Bozo was still elected and sworn in as president. Even assuming that Bozo is ineligible to serve, that doesn't invalidate the law. His actions as president are still authoritative.
Analogy: say it turned out that a recently hired CEO of a major corporation lied on his resume and didn't meet basic requirements for the job. But, when the board of directors discover the violation, they decide to keep him in office. The CEO would still be the boss.
“But, when the board of directors discover the violation, they decide to keep him in office.”
The board of directors doesn’t have a Constitution to deal with...
In your analogy the corporation would have to amend the company's founding documents which state that someone without X is ineligible to be CEO, and the board of directors must win a 2/3 vote of all the departments heads to change the founding documents. Obama does not have the right to be president, period. I do not consider him to be my president. He's a Communist infiltrator, and will get his due one day. I personally am 1/300 millionth president of the USA right now. He is Zero!
The order to report to Fort Campbell is not an illegal order. But facts are a terrible burden for many folks. :-)
A major corporation isn’t the same as the nation which must follow the Constitution. What a crappy analogy.
The military can not be compared to a private corporation.
Lying on your resume for a job is a tad different than committing fraud the for position of President. Treason. Whether or not BamBam’s laws would be made null and void would be a political issue, most likely. It would be hard for the parties who protected Obama fraud to argue we should live under the laws signed by a treasonous President.
If Obama is found not to be legally in the white house, I want all of those involved up for treason for abetting Obama’s crime. That is why they are all so desparate to cover up what they have done to the American people and our constitution.
Wow! Really? A member of FR since 2002 and you haven’t read and/or understand the Constitution we live under?
America is not a democracy. We do not live under mob rule.
This is a Republic. We have laws we live by. No one is above the law. Even an elected, lying, traitor, like Barry.
You are either not American or you do not understand basic American history.
It isn't illegal for the board of directors to keep him on. I would question the board's judgment but it would not be illegal! However, the President of the United States must be a natural born citizen by law. To keep a usurper on as POTUS would be illegal. It violates the highest law of the land. So, your analogy doesn't hold water.
Who would be the board of directors in that analogy?
And the analogy also falls apart in that a company runs its own affairs, but we have an entire judicial system set up to protect the US Constitution - or at least we’re supposed to have.
And the analogy would work better if the CEO was also caught forging documents and committing perjury in order to get the job. At that point law enforcement should enter the picture and it shouldn’t even matter what the company decides; the guy should sit in jail.
Gary, is that the kind of rhetoric that you are teaching your students???
And the stockholders could still get rid of both the CEO and the board.
I don’t think an analogy of private business is applicable to a government situation. However, your posting begs the question Is this more than just involving an individual’s(i.e. BHO) eligibility, in that the election procedural actions were fraudulent because all information required by the Constitution for eligibility was not given to the public and/or closed , even perhaps intentionally so? Is there a Constitutional remedy for such a case? To me it just shows how untrusworthy and unscrupulous people can be when it comes to government.