Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/20/2010 4:58:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
24th Amendment

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

2 posted on 04/20/2010 5:00:50 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You could also illustrate it the other way: imagine a system where every full dollar paid in [federal] taxes gave that citizen 1 ‘vote’ [though a citizen could NOT split his ‘votes’ up; they would have to be en block].

The “Soak the rich” policies suddenly bite the “freeloaders” in the ass... the poor would have no votes at all and “the rich” would easily be able to ‘buy’ the candidate they want.
{Of course there is something to note about such a system, decreasing your taxes decreases the power you would have in voting; and raising taxes for others would be equivalent to giving them power.}


3 posted on 04/20/2010 5:05:31 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And let’s not forget that Government employees don’t really pay taxes on their salaries. The “taxes” are deducted in a bookkeeping slight of hand; the tax-paying citizens, who are paying the Goverment workers’ salaries, are also paying the taxes.

VietVet


10 posted on 04/20/2010 5:15:31 PM PDT by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I don’t think I’d be comfortable with any 10% of the population having 73% of the votes.


13 posted on 04/20/2010 5:27:46 PM PDT by ledzep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Full circle...

No Representation without Taxation. If you have no skin in the game, you’re out!


14 posted on 04/20/2010 5:31:02 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It’s like the old riddle.

Q: When at a party, who gets the last slice of pizza?

A: The person who paid for it.

I say a flat 15% divided equally between a 7.5% sales tax and a 7.5% income tax.


16 posted on 04/20/2010 6:01:11 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Those who cannot contribute are not allowed to retain their (voting) rights of citizenship.” - Aristotle


17 posted on 04/20/2010 6:04:31 PM PDT by Jacquerie (The law is reason unaffected by desire - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No taxation without representation.

No representation without taxation.

If I pay twice as much tax as the other guy, why shouldn’t my vote count twice as much as his?


19 posted on 04/20/2010 6:06:51 PM PDT by Enough is ENOUGH (Select conservatives for the coming primaries, now. Vote out the incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What that says is that the middle class is shrinking and the lower class is expanding. The rich are getting richer and in many cases their wealth is obscene.


27 posted on 04/20/2010 7:07:31 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I'm not proposing that we take voting rights away from those who do not pay taxes. What I'm suggesting is that every American gets one vote in every federal election, plus another vote for each $20,000 he pays in federal taxes.

Again, I think for this to work at all, it would have to be based on tax liabilities, not one what amount of tax is actually "paid." A taxpayer should not be "punished" for good tax planning -- and if the feds don't like that, then change the tax code so it is more like a flat tax.

How about this, Williams? Every American gets to vote for President. Only those with tax liabilities get to vote for congresscritters and senators. Think about it.

And here's another idea: Every American gets to vote for President, but come up with a way to tie a percentage of a State's Electors to the Electoral College to the State's taxpayers.

28 posted on 04/20/2010 7:26:23 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Sic semper tyrannis! Stop spending. Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Repeal the Seventeenth Amendment. Problem basically solved.


30 posted on 04/20/2010 7:41:07 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I believe that this is exactly what our founders had in mind -- never the insanity of allowing anyone at all that pays NO income taxes, vote for people promising programs that must be paid for with someone else's income tax!

That sounds a lot like what Obama told "Joe the Plumber" during the '08 election!!!

34 posted on 04/20/2010 10:26:19 PM PDT by zerosix (native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson