Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Synthesis via paths less travelled (Marijuana receptors appear to serve a necessary function.)
Highlights in Chemical Biology ^ | 15 April 2010 | Philippa Ross

Posted on 04/20/2010 12:29:38 AM PDT by neverdem

US scientists have demonstrated the existence of undiscovered chemical pathways to an important class of bioactive lipids in the nervous system. 

Endocannabinoids are lipid messengers that play a key role in both central and peripheral tissues, where they participate in diverse physiological processes including appetite, pain-sensation, mood, and memory. Unlike other neurotransmitters such as amino acids and neuropeptides, they are not water soluble so cannot be stored in the body and are made on-demand from phospholipid precursors involving complex multiple pathways. A complete understanding of these mechanisms is crucial to understanding their effects in mammalian physiology, explains Benjamin Cravatt and Gabriel Simon at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla. 

In vitro studies have suggested a number of pathways to make N-acyl-ethanolamines (NAEs), a key endocannabionid lipid as alternatives to the well known conversion of N-acyl phosphatidyl entanolamine (NAPE) by reaction with phosphodiesterase enzymes known as NAPE-PLD and GDE-1. Now, Cravatt and Simon have demonstrated the existence of other pathways using additional enzymes in an in vivo study. 

Pathway to endocannabinoids

Endocannabinoids are made in the body via a number of complex pathways

By studying mice deficient in the enzymes GDE1 and NAPE-PLD, the pair discovered that although there were significant reductions in NAPE to NAE conversion by the known pathways, there was no overall change in NAE levels in the mice brain tissue. 'This result supports the existence of additional NAPE-catabolising enzymes that are operant in situ, and likely in vivo,' explains Cravatt.

Edward Tate, an expert in enzymology and chemical genetics at Imperial College London, UK comments that the move from in vitro to in vivo models is an interesting step to take. 'This work provides another piece in the puzzle of in vivo NAPE/NAE biochemistry and has given a strong indication of where to start looking for the next one,' he adds. 

The researchers say that their next step will be to investigate whether alternative pathways for NAE that do not involve NAPE as the required precursor exist. 

 

 

Link to journal article

Characterization of mice lacking candidate N-acyl ethanolamine biosynthetic enzymes provides evidence for multiple pathways that contribute to endocannabinoid production in vivo
Gabriel M. Simon and Benjamin F. Cravatt, Mol. BioSyst., 2010
DOI: 10.1039/c000237b

Also of interest

Interview: Shining a light on the proteome

Ben Cravatt on his research into the function of the proteome and success in cloning the cDNA of a hotly pursued enzyme

Forget drugs, get inhibited!

Promising compounds which may help patients overcome drug addictions have been identified by US scientists

Instant insight: Alzheimer's: untangling the facts

Cures for Alzheimer's may come from understanding its chemistry. Arvi Rauk examines the disease at the molecular level


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: biology; endocannabinoids; marijuanareceptors; neurology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Endocannabinoids show that the receptors that bind to marijuana need more research, IMHO. The Lord giveth. The government denies.

The abstract links the complete article.

1 posted on 04/20/2010 12:29:39 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

How about heroin receptors?


2 posted on 04/20/2010 12:35:37 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Mojave
How about heroin receptors?

Endorphins bind to them.

4 posted on 04/20/2010 12:42:30 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Actually, I believe Breast Milk has substances that are recognized by the same receptors.


5 posted on 04/20/2010 12:42:42 AM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; pandoraou812

There will be no end-o-cannabinoids around here. lol


6 posted on 04/20/2010 12:57:59 AM PDT by TigersEye (Duncan Hunter, Jim DeMint, Michelle Bachman, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Dude!


7 posted on 04/20/2010 1:01:00 AM PDT by counterpunch (GOP: Government's Other Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Atom-grabbing 'black hole' created

Obesity gene, carried by more than a third of the U.S. population, leads to brain tissue loss

JNC 7 Blood Pressure Targets Challenged

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

8 posted on 04/20/2010 1:18:46 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

9 posted on 04/20/2010 3:15:20 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bflr


10 posted on 04/20/2010 4:22:59 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Endorphins bind to them.

So you want marijuana AND heroin legalized? Trippy.

11 posted on 04/20/2010 5:33:28 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Obesity gene, carried by more than a third of the U.S. population, leads to brain tissue loss”

Now HERE we have some undisputed science !


12 posted on 04/20/2010 6:26:24 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
So you want marijuana AND heroin legalized? Trippy.

Who mentioned heroin? Thanks for the unwarranted assumption and the ad hominem. Conservatives usually do better than that.

I'd end the war on some drugs for the bogus rationalizations of the harm done to society, and that it's for the children. I'd make at least some raw drugs as found in nature legal. Drugs based on opium, i.e. heroin, are already legally prescribed. Intravenous drug abuse spreads too many lethal diseases.

The gateway theory that marijuana use leads to later hard drug abuse has been debunked.

“It is important that we keep prescription drugs out of the hands of our youth,” says Ken McManus, Rockwood’s Drug-Free Coalition director. “Federal studies show that adolescent prescription medication abuse is advancing at a faster rate than marijuana and alcohol combined.” McManus noted.

The costs of the war on some drugs outweigh its benefits. It helps to promote the war on guns, fuels organized crimes and police corruption as well as causes an unending, needless list of innocents to get killed by overzealous cops whether working on lame information or addresses.

Conservatives usually understand that you can't change human nature, unlike the utopians.

13 posted on 04/20/2010 10:26:12 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Who mentioned heroin?

You did when you responded that "endorphins" bind to the same receptors.

And the receptor argument is the same one you used to argue for legalizing marijuana.

I'd end the war on some drugs

Yep. That a major goal of the left.

14 posted on 04/20/2010 12:23:18 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"Who mentioned heroin?"

You did when you responded that "endorphins" bind to the same receptors.

Check comment# 2. You asked, "How about heroin receptors?"

The usual term is opiate receptors that bind enkephalins as well as endorphins.

Yep. That a major goal of the left.

George Schulz(sp?), former Secretary of State for Reagan, and Bill Buckley, some really big lefties, I guess.

15 posted on 04/20/2010 12:42:54 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You asked, "How about heroin receptors?"

And you answered with the assertion that "endorphins" bind to the same receptors. The same non sequitur that you offered as a reason for legalizing marijuana.

George Schulz(sp?)

George Shultz held that states were free to either enact or reject medical marijuana laws, as they chose.

Bill Buckley

When did Buckley advocate legalizing all drugs?

16 posted on 04/20/2010 12:54:38 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
And you answered with the assertion that "endorphins" bind to the same receptors. The same non sequitur that you offered as a reason for legalizing marijuana.

You mentioned heroin first in the context of "heroin receptors." I fail to see how it is a non sequitur. The opiate receptors are used for legal analgesia, aka pain relief. Why shouldn't the receptors of endocannabinoid system be used when using legal opiates is very problematic from severe constipation to fatal respiratory arrest?

Targeting CB2 receptors and the endocannabinoid system for the treatment of pain

George Shultz held that states were free to either enact or reject medical marijuana laws, as they chose.

Searching "George Shultz" legalize marijuana I only could find this second hand quote on Yahoo and Google:

In 1989, none other than former Secretary of State, George Shultz wrote in the Wall Street Journal that the United States is not going to get anywhere “until we can take the criminality out of the drug business and incentives for criminality out of it.

“Frankly,” Shultz continued, “the only way I can think of to accomplish this is to make it possible for addicts to buy drugs at some regulated place at a price that approximates their cost. We need to consider and examine forms of controlled legalization of drugs.”

From searching at the Wall Street Journal, it appears that nonsubscribers can only search back to two years.

When did Buckley advocate legalizing all drugs?

He didn't. I wrote: "I'd make at least some raw drugs as found in nature legal." I'd limit it to marijuana, raw opium and coca leaf for selling in gov't regulated sources to adults.

As it is now, the utopian and endless war on some drugs is helping to fund the Taliban, the FARC in Columbia and causing refugees from the Mexican drug cartes to get asylum in the USA.

Because of all this foolery, I have to worry about being sued for not prescribing adequate analgesia by being too stingy writing scripts on the malpractice side, and I have too worry about being prosecuted by the unpredictable DEA for being too generous with controlled drugs.

Adios

17 posted on 04/20/2010 6:10:29 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You mentioned heroin first

So?

I fail to see how it is a non sequitur.

*If a drug interacts with receptors it must be legalized* is one of the most spurious non sequiturs I've even seen.

“Frankly,” Shultz continued, “the only way I can think of to accomplish this is to make it possible for addicts to buy drugs at some regulated place at a price that approximates their cost. We need to consider and examine forms of controlled legalization of drugs.”

Consider? Examine? That seems to fall short of a call for ending all drug laws. Regulated? Controlled? In fact, that description sounds like continuing federal control of drugs to me. With a dollop of taxpayer subsidies. I can see why you would like that last part.

I wrote: "I'd make at least some raw drugs as found in nature legal."

I thought you called for ending the "war on some drugs." I guess you really didn't mean what you said.

18 posted on 04/20/2010 6:46:07 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

http://old.nationalreview.com/buckley/buckley200406291207.asp


19 posted on 04/20/2010 7:34:41 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Healthcare adds 16,000 new IRS agents and zero new doctors???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Not all drugs.


20 posted on 04/20/2010 7:53:58 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson