Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big 10 Expansion Talks Accelerate
ESPN ^ | April 18, 2010 | Adam Rittenberg

Posted on 04/19/2010 9:08:21 AM PDT by bobjam

The Big Ten expansion process will accelerate this week in Washington, according to a report in the Chicago Tribune.

Sources tell the Tribune top Big Ten officials will discuss expansion Sunday in Washington, the site of the Association of American Universities meetings.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: big10; conference; expansion; football
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Personally, I think the Big 10 should go for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers is an AAU university, good football program (maybe not PennSt or OSU, but certainly in line, if not ahead of Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin), plays multiple sports well, and strengthens the Big 10 presence in NYC. Also, New Jersey is good for recruiting.
1 posted on 04/19/2010 9:08:21 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Not a bad idea. ‘Cuse would get them into NY state which might be better than Rutgers for them.

Really if they are going to continue to call themselves the Big Ten with 12 members, they need to try to end up in 10 states. Right now they are in 1. PA, PSU 2. Oh, OSU 3. IN, IU/PU 4. MI, MSU/UM 5. IL, NWU/UIl 6. IA, UIa, 7. MN, UMn. So could they add three states? Rutgers, ‘Cuse and say Missouri?


2 posted on 04/19/2010 9:13:35 AM PDT by JLS (Democrats: People who wont even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Lets add Notre Dame so there’s a new doormat for the football teams to beat up on...


3 posted on 04/19/2010 9:15:29 AM PDT by libs_kma (If you RAM it down our throats in 2009, we're going to SHOVE it up your "donkey" in 2010!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I think it is stupid to have a league larger than the ability for each team to play all of the others in a season. Ten is about the maximum for a football season, eliminates non-league games. So really eight makes more sense.


4 posted on 04/19/2010 9:17:35 AM PDT by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma

Texas Longhorns.


5 posted on 04/19/2010 9:18:20 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

I suspect that the Big Ten would love to add Notre Dame or Texas. Any addition other than those two would be somewhat disappointing. The other schools mentioned are solid programs but not the gold-standard of Texas or Notre Dame.


6 posted on 04/19/2010 9:19:57 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

With 12 members they will call themselves the Big Eleven.


7 posted on 04/19/2010 9:20:03 AM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Just stay out of my Pac 10.


8 posted on 04/19/2010 9:20:48 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS
With the exception of TV sets, a perfect fit is Iowa State. (My choice, if I were Jim Delaney for a day) AAU school, great engineering school, great geographic fit, not scary to anyone on the football side, strong all-sports athletics (currently about 25th in the Learfield Cup). The problem is there is already an in-state school of Iowa, and ISU doesn't bring that many more eyeballs to the Big10 Network.

Rutgers is a good fit, but suffers due to geography--volleyball, softball, etc still have to travel there. Nebraska is a good fit, except I can't imagine they want a newcomer that is going to strongly challenge for football titles right away. Syracuse doesn't bring quite as many eyeballs, but might not be bad, but suffers on geography as well.

Missouri to me is the best fit, except I don't know if they are quite at the academic level that the Big 10 wants. Cincinnati, Louisville, and West Virginia definitely trail on the academic side.

9 posted on 04/19/2010 9:23:18 AM PDT by Pappy Smear (Support the presidency, end the policies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pappy Smear

Florida, Alabama, or LSU so they have a chance in the big game?


10 posted on 04/19/2010 9:24:59 AM PDT by Ingtar (Obama's favorite carol: Hark The Herald Angels Sing About Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Interesting in that it might set off a chain reaction. I’ve heard some scuttlebutt that the Big East teams that have a basketball only membership are giving some thought to forming their own conference, and this might give a little bit of a push to that idea.

A new conference consisting of Villanova, Marquette, DePaul, Georgetown, Notre Dame (obviously basketball only), Seton Hall, plus maybe Xavier, Dayton, Temple, and Butler would be an interesting idea.


11 posted on 04/19/2010 9:25:59 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pappy Smear

Pitt or WVU would fit.


12 posted on 04/19/2010 9:27:53 AM PDT by brownsfan (The average American: Uninformed, and unconcerned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Raider

Ping


13 posted on 04/19/2010 9:31:13 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

They are looking to add 3 to 5 teams, so that would work!


14 posted on 04/19/2010 9:34:57 AM PDT by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore); aft_lizard; Archie Bunker on steroids; Auntbee; Bad~Rodeo; Bat_Chemist; ...
The FR College Football Ping List
FReepmail GOP_Raider to be on or off this list

15 posted on 04/19/2010 9:38:18 AM PDT by GOP_Raider (<----Click over there for a special message from GOP_Raider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I really don’t see the Longhorns in the Big 10.


16 posted on 04/19/2010 9:38:23 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sicvee
I think it is stupid to have a league larger than the ability for each team to play all of the others in a season. Ten is about the maximum for a football season, eliminates non-league games.

You are correct, of course, but we are talking big-time college sports, money, and greed here. Common sense goes out the window when those college presidents see dollar signs in their eyes. Adding a team and then splitting the conference into two divisions means an extra championship game will now be played that will bring in huge revenue.

17 posted on 04/19/2010 9:45:12 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

The Longhorns would be stupid to join the Big 10. It’s not a fit geographically or any other way. Even the Big 12 is not a great fit but it’s infineitly better than the Big 10.
Besides, top to bottom, the Big 12 is stronger than the Big 10.
Also, the Texas Legislature has made it clear that Texas and Texas A&M are both going to have to remain in the same Conference and A&M is not going anywhere. They wanted to join the SEC when the old SWC folded but UT wanted to form the Big 12 so they reluctantly went along.
Unfortuneatly, they haven’t been worth a damn since.


18 posted on 04/19/2010 9:52:16 AM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Word on the street in Pittsburgh is that Pitt would have a hard time turning this down. They are deathly afraid of getting stranded in the Big East if there were a repeat of the BC-VaTech ship-jumping of a few years back. Plus Pitt football fans would absolutely LOVE having the Big 10 cram a home-and-home series with the Nittany Lions up JoePa’s arse. Most of the pro-Big East argument is around the basketball program.


19 posted on 04/19/2010 9:53:10 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
From everything I'm hearing, Rutgers is No. 1 on the list. The AAU is a requirement for the Big Ten and will limit the number of schools. This is the order I'm hearing:

1. Rutgers

2. Nebraska

3. Missouri

I can assure you, it will NOT be Notre Dame.

20 posted on 04/19/2010 9:54:32 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson