[Lazamataz]

I agree with Hillyer and the majority of the American people that Palin is not qualified to be president.

Reagan was a governor of a large state. Palin was a governor of a large state. Reagan was telegenic. Palin is telegenic. Reagan drew the ire of the Presstitutes. Palin draws the ire of the Presstitutes. Reagan stayed on a conservative message. Palin stays on a conservative message.

Yeah, I can see your point.

[faucetman]

“Reagan was a governor of a large state. Palin was a governor of a large state. Reagan was telegenic. Palin is telegenic. Reagan drew the ire of the Presstitutes. Palin draws the ire of the Presstitutes. Reagan stayed on a conservative message. Palin stays on a conservative message”

I read the whole article. This was a typical hit piece from an establishment Republican point of view.

The Republican establishment is DEAD, they just don't know it yet.

While Palin isn't Reagan, the similarities are STRIKING. CHARACHTER MATTERS. The right PERSON is paramount, you can HIRE experience.

[wtc911]

To complete your comparison...Reagan served his full two terms. Palin served until things got too tough.

[Chuckster]

Reagan had three decades of experience on her. But you are correct as far as it goes.

[Cyber Liberty]

Sounds like Palin is as unqualified as Reagan. Liberals and elitists still spew spittle when they say his name. I’m looking forward to the same for Palin in another 10-15 years.

Let’s hope you and I will still be here to see it....

[The Pack Knight]

Reagan was a governor of a large state. Palin was a governor of a large state.

Reagan was the governor of America's most populous state for eight years. Palin was the governor of America's fouth-least populous state for two years before resigning in the middle of her only term. Is that really the same thing?