Posted on 04/16/2010 4:26:38 AM PDT by BCW
WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA? D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility Contends president's allegiance is to Britain, Kenya, Indonesia Posted: January 29, 2010 12:20 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily A prominent attorney who has shepherded a number of high-profile legal cases challenging Barack Obama'seligibility to be president has brought a "Quo Warranto" case to district court in Washington, D.C., alleging his allegiances have included Britain, Kenya and Indonesia. A Quo Warranto action, first recorded some 800 years ago, essentially is a demand to know by what authority a public figure is acting. The case, brought by California attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of herself, was assigned to Chief Judge Royce Lamberth. Taitz told WND that in a separate action she has filed a notice of appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of the dismissal of a case she brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and dozens of other individuals in California challenging Obama's eligibility. She previously attempted Quo Warranto cases on behalf of government officials, without response. This time she filed the action directly with the court on her own behalf. "The case revolves around the federal question of eligibility of the president under Quo Warranto," she wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
shills for what?!
Here’s another twist to person I would call an “AWOL” or the “dirt” spreader in the 4th potato row:
How to tell if you are a British citizen
If you were born before 1 January 1983
On 1 January 1983, anyone who was a citizen of the UK and Colonies on 31 December 1982, and had the ‘right of abode’ in the UK, became a British citizen.
‘Right of abode’ means you are entirely free from UK Immigration Control and don’t need to get permission from an Immigration Officer to enter the UK and can live and work in the UK without restriction.
This includes people who:
* were born in the UK
* were born in a British colony and had the right of abode in the UK
* have been naturalised in the UK
* had registered as a citizen of the UK and Colonies
* could prove legitimate descent from a father to whom one of these applies
People who had the right to live in the UK but not the ‘right of abode’ did not become British citizens.
Yes...we went to war to REJECT British doctrine, and we WON.
So does that British doctrine we fought against and beat in 1814 apply to US Citizens today? Most legal scholars say no...and birthers keep losing cases. Every one.
Quite an intelligent statement you only would expect from a 1st grader and therefore, still more, I feel sorry for your kids and the whole family of yours!!!
The Founders often wrote about the natural tendency of governments to become tyrannies through time. The Constitution belongs to The People; and The People are wholly responsible for its enforcement. That brings up the Second Amendment, which also must be enforced by The People. After all the Second Amendment is part of the Constitution, which belongs in its entirety to We The People.
Our government needs to be "reigned in" on these matters.
You’re a proven liar by your own words. You have nothing of value to be heard.
Hey Mrs. Rogers, I will certainly take my doorknob brain over your small Pinhead brain!
However, here’s a brave man (the only one present I know of out there) who is speaking seriously to you and ME!!
Your posted voting analysis, is what he compare you using a credit card!!!
http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=7427
The Writings of Thomas by Thomas Jefferson and Henry Augustine Washington
Page 596 International Law (See Laws of Nations)
clicking the caption we arrive Index TO Volume II
Hope this helps finding Laws of Nations was used by the Founders.
jefferson writes law of the nations and laws of the land.
One instance he writes on page 493. “The clauses of the Convention of 1784..with privileges of the laws of nations,...to laws of the land..
page 416..the fourth article gives to the counsels the immunities of the laws of the nations..
page 417 it is mentioned again..
READ, uninformed one! Barack’s mother did not meet the age or residency requirements of Hawaii to pass her citizenship on to her son; Barack’s father (or the man we are given to believe is his father) was a Kenyan national. He and Barack Jr. both attained Kenyan citizenship at the same time under the new Kenya Constitution: December 12, 1963.
Then that means that every child born to underage parents is not a citizen. That means that my maternal grandparents, married at age 15, could not pass on citizenship to their 2 oldest children, one of them my mother. Does that mean I am not a citizen?
Grow up jackass
Very good point Nuke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.