Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2010: Highlighting the GOP's Prospects at the SRLC
Townhall.com ^ | April 10, 2010 | Jillian Bandes

Posted on 04/10/2010 5:08:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

The three themes of SRLC are: repeal the health care bill, remain The Party of No, and repair the Republican brand. Oh, and, win every election in sight.

"People are starting to wake up," said Texas Governor Rick Perry. "Thank God, we have come out of that fog, and we haven't landed yet, but we see the airport."

Again and again, speakers referenced the importance of the 2010 mid-terms. Strategy, money, policy, outreach, personality, women, bourbon - you name it, and it was cited as a possible factor in influencing November. But repealing health care, saying no - preferable, "heck" no, in the words of Bobby Jindal - and rebuilding the Republican party came up again and again.

The "saying no" theme was only interrupted by Newt Gingrich, who used his SRLC platform to say that the GOP needed to transform itself into "the party of yes." Skeptics wondered that every other speaker emphasizing just the opposite was a sort of rebuke to Newt, who has an uphill battle ahead of him is he is to make a 2012 presidential run.

Rebuilding the GOP brand was attacked by nearly every speaker, especially by Sarah Palin, who delivered a strongly-worded rebuke to the GOP's current state of affairs.

"Some of us, part of the tea party movement, are what we used to call Reagan democrats, are just independents, just lovers of this country, are so proud, but are now... deeply concerned about our country," said Sarah Palin. "Some of them are concerned about our party, our GOP."

Former Congressman J.C. Watts was another speaker who emphasized the transitional nature of the GOP.

"I believe so many Americans have gotten this skewed version of what politics are over the last 6-8 years," said Watts. "We've got a generation of Americans that don't remember when a blackberry was a fruit."

"I don't think that in any way its going to be an easy task, but it's doable," said one participant, from Jesu City, Mississippi. She was in her mid-thirties and thought that

A number of panelists, such as Jan Larimer, Co-Chairman of the Republican National Committee, had strong feelings about the ability of the GOP to take back the other cycle, especially given the support from women.

"I think women are going to have a huge hand to play. Women are so engaged in Obamacare, and the future that is being left for their future and grandchildren," said Larimer. "If you look at the Tea Party movement - I was involved in the march on D.C. There were a lot of women there... we're going to have an incredible cycle."

Optimism was palpable as participants ate up appearances from half a dozen governors and Congressmen, and staked out choice eateries in the French Quarter. But Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal had one word of advice: stay away from Bourbon Street, known for its strip clubs and gambling.

"A word of advice to GOP staffers, you may want to stay away from Bourbon Street. Just a little advice," he said.

Today, Haley Barbour, Mike Pence, and Michael Steele will keynote.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; backlash; gop; gopcomeback; impeachbho; repealobamacare; repealromneycare; romneycare

1 posted on 04/10/2010 5:08:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If only Gingrich would GO AWAY


2 posted on 04/10/2010 5:30:42 AM PDT by Carley (Are you better off than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

So Gingrich isn’t perfect enough for you? Eh?


3 posted on 04/10/2010 5:42:00 AM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

He muddles the message of HELL NO!!!!


4 posted on 04/10/2010 6:00:46 AM PDT by Carley (Are you better off than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carley

i’m with you


5 posted on 04/10/2010 6:13:33 AM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
said Texas Governor Rick Perry. "Thank God, we have come out of that fog, and we haven't landed yet, but we see the airport."

Even inadvertent comedy is all in the timing.

One of those, "well it seemed like a harmless analogy at the time" things.

6 posted on 04/10/2010 6:32:56 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
So Gingrich isn’t perfect enough for you? Eh?

Let's see...

Endorsed Scuzzy.
Sat on a loveseat with Pelosi
Drank the AGW Koolaide
Joined Hillary to call for a federal medical records program.

Should I go on? How many warts does it take to for you to realize that Newt is a toad, not a prince?

7 posted on 04/10/2010 9:32:30 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Romney is done because of his healthcare plan. Newt is a non-starter because of global warming. A red meat conservative is gonna take it. I think Pence, Ryan, and Mitch Daniels will win and go with Palin for VP to energize the crowds or Cantor to tke Va. and help with Florida, NJ, and NY.


8 posted on 04/10/2010 8:19:52 PM PDT by MattinNJ (I learned all I needed to know about Islam from watching "Stoning of Soraya M")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley; Sen Jack S. Fogbound
The problem with being the Party of Yes is that you're accepting the SRM's label of you in the first place as the Party of No. It follows, then, that you can only be the Party of Yes if they say you are, and we all know what that means: go along with the statists. Same old game with the same disastrous results every time it's played. Newt should know better.

The opposition to what is being done has to be an unequivocal No:

With the Yes always stated just as unequivocally:

Not the SRM No and Yes, but the conservative No and Yes. Huge difference.
9 posted on 04/11/2010 4:32:46 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson