Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: All
The Pubs had better make this a fight.
This can be a real election year boon if they fight obama’s radical nominees...
3 posted on
04/09/2010 7:43:21 AM PDT by
Maverick68
(w)
To: stevie_d_64
I wonder what tenured marxist will replace him.
4 posted on
04/09/2010 7:44:09 AM PDT by
WOBBLY BOB
( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
To: stevie_d_64
Lets see if the republicans have the stones to fight another socialist nominee this time.
Whattaya say, Orrin?
6 posted on
04/09/2010 7:46:27 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: stevie_d_64
just think of how things could have been different if 0 had not been elected. we were very close to removing the tyranny of the SC lefties. What a blown opportunity.
7 posted on
04/09/2010 7:46:45 AM PDT by
jtal
To: stevie_d_64
Well, it will be a change from a Liberal, to an America-hating Marxist who embraces fascism.
But I repeat myself.
8 posted on
04/09/2010 7:46:47 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: stevie_d_64
Dirty pervert is doing it now to make sure that the Dems still hold the majority in the Senate. Because he wants to make sure Obama can appoint another freak rat traitor to the Constitution like himself. he knows just like we do, if his replacement isn’t a done and sealed issue, come November, He won’t see himself replaced by nother like minded scumrat Leftist.
He is retiring for purely political motives and timing.
12 posted on
04/09/2010 7:48:32 AM PDT by
DGHoodini
(Iran Azadi!)
To: stevie_d_64
One Chicago Lawyer for another one...
13 posted on
04/09/2010 7:48:45 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: stevie_d_64
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, the court's oldest member and leader of its liberal bloc, he is retiring.What appalling grammar.
14 posted on
04/09/2010 7:49:02 AM PDT by
hsalaw
To: stevie_d_64
This is GREAT. If we can take a big bite out of the Dem majority or even reverse it, we can force a better appointment than Stevens!!!!!
To: stevie_d_64
I guess I'm an eternal optimist, but I think the timing could be good on this one. It's also helpful that he's the libbiest of the bunch. Of course the Kenyan will want to replace him with an out-and-out communist.
That may not play in Peoria THIS time.
To: stevie_d_64
Not surprising. Now Bowrama will be able to replace the top liberal with a even more left leaning progressive!
26 posted on
04/09/2010 7:53:57 AM PDT by
Road Warrior ‘04
(I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
To: stevie_d_64
NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA
HEY HEYYY
GOODBYE
27 posted on
04/09/2010 7:54:10 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: stevie_d_64
The Obama administration is sure to nominate someone with a strong ACLU / public employee union legal background. Or perhaps a wise, muslim, homosexual.
30 posted on
04/09/2010 7:54:38 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: stevie_d_64
He’s got to retire before Obama loses Congress in November.
32 posted on
04/09/2010 7:55:56 AM PDT by
ohioWfan
(Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
To: stevie_d_64
You think Republicans should filibuster Obama’s appointment till the next congress ?? It seems tempting given the timing.
33 posted on
04/09/2010 7:56:06 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=taxes delayed")
To: stevie_d_64
Well, at least it’s a liberal.
Easy prediction: The nominee will be a minority female, so that they can play the race and misogyny card and keep the “Tea Parties are racist” narrative going.
37 posted on
04/09/2010 8:01:00 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
To: stevie_d_64
Which minority will Zero Point Zero pander to this time?
38 posted on
04/09/2010 8:01:09 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
To: stevie_d_64
Desperation by the traitor Rat, after November Zero won’t be able to ram his Marxist replacement down our throats.
44 posted on
04/09/2010 8:03:55 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: stevie_d_64
Maybe he can find somebody even more doctrinaire and less effective that Sotomayor.
45 posted on
04/09/2010 8:05:39 AM PDT by
Haiku Guy
(Gov. Chris Christie (R) won the NJ-6 held by Rep. Frank Pallone (D) by a 15.5% margin!)
To: stevie_d_64
One thing you can say about Stevens (as well as Souter) in that he was a traitor to the end. He could have retired while a Republican was in office since he was appointed by a Republican, but he wanted to make sure the Marxists kept his seat.
I wanted him to last at least until we had a better chance to get a better candidate with more GOP Senators in 2011. Maybe the GOP will have the balls to filibuster until then.
47 posted on
04/09/2010 8:07:51 AM PDT by
MBB1984
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson