I think some folks miss the point.
Is “proving” the dirty moslem marxist to be a Usurper, in a court of law, unlikely?
Yes.
But keep in mind one thing. Bush was basically destroyed by leftists who just KEPT ATTACKING HIM. Over and over. Relentlessly. Could they ever “prove” he was a “war criminal?” Of course not! Just the opposite was true — Bush ousted a REAL war criminal, Saddam.
But the effectiveness of the attack is they just kept repeating it, every day, all day. They kept attacking nonstop. And to a large degree, it worked to clobber and undermine Bush.
And if that same technique helps get rid of this filty moslem communist traitor piece of garbage, then SO BE IT. Even if we NEVER “prove” he’s a usurper, we have an obligation to try.
You make a great point. And I agree that what’s good for the goose...
That might be expressed as “repeat the truth often enough and people will believe it”!
Post #59
Nailed it.
Never really thought of things that way, but you’re right...